stephen
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I don't know that McGrath would actually beat Murali in a straight up poll. After all, McGrath, while being the absolute best new ball bowler was not really the best old ball bowler of all time. I'd say that Lillee was better in that role.Thats assuming people really are voting that way, and not for the bowler they think better. I mentioned as much earlier with my comment regarding Lillee, yet he has picked up 3 more votes, and Ambrose has gained ground on McGrath. This may indicate a preference for a better bowler, not necessarily for a pacer or spinner.
I do agree thought that a vote between Murali, McGrath, and Kallis would likely have been better.
Murali is the best choice and it is plain to see why - he brings variety and danger to an excellent attack. Sometimes the track is better suited to his type of spin than Warne's. They complement each other very well.
I just don't really see what another seamer would bring to this attack when you have three of the worlds best ever seamers already in the lineup, and the seamers on offer are similar to other seamers already in the attack.