Sorry, it's an Alan Clark reference, so blame him.Can't you just speak English? Thats the second time today that I've had to look up a word from one of your posts, which is normally a good thing, but one of them wasn't even correct.
Bleh. The truth is ALWAYS somewhere in between.burr said:You see this is why radio commentary is better than tv. On the cricket show I saw O’Donnell and Slater attempting to defend Warne and his absurd suggestion his comments were taken out of context. Which of course they had to, because the whole thing has the feeling of some awful boys club. And on the radio just now Roebuck pointed out Warne was always talking about Murali and subtly ridiculed him. Good on you Roeby.
didn't botham break lillee's record and then hadlee broke botham's?And for the record, Lillee's record was broken by Hadlee and Kapil only broke Hadlee's record... So I am not surprised that Aussies were not too fussed about it..![]()
i did before i read both your posts, just go for it man...Sigh! And I was going to indulge my penchant for pedantry, Sean.![]()
well, yeah...didn't botham break lillee's record and then hadlee broke botham's?
Fair play MuraliThen Murali describes Warne as "the greatest bowler ever produced in this entire world"
Warne really is an incredible jackass.
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22747910-5001023,00.htmlDoes anyone have a copy of his original column article?
Ah, I originally had thought it was a question posed to Warne and he had given that reply. But if you read that, it really becomes disappointing. Just ****-stirring from the sidelines. I think Warne feels he needs to get on the action or put his mark on things. Really disappointing, as aforesaid. I side with Murali on this one. You can essentially lift that part from the article and it still makes sense and is a good read.http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22747910-5001023,00.html
Lol at this whole thing btw, it's all so silly.
Did any of you catch Steve Waugh's recent comment about Murali's action being OK and, IIRC, being the greatest ever? Couldn't posssibly be an attempt to wind up his former team mate who didn't place him very his all time top 50 by any chance.
Stephen Waugh and Shane Warne both work in mysterious ways TBH. Just Waugh gives-off the air of being rather smart with it.Did any of you catch Steve Waugh's recent comment about Murali's action being OK and, IIRC, being the greatest ever? Couldn't posssibly be an attempt to wind up his former team mate who didn't place him very his all time top 50 by any chance.
Far smarter than Warne anyway. Not that it's overly hard.Stephen Waugh and Shane Warne both work in mysterious ways TBH. Just Waugh gives-off the air of being rather smart with it.