honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
man was hoping for at least one of those two for this round.
Haha it was actually a complete toss-up between Walcott and Cummins for me; ended up taking Cummins because I thought Walcott was a better chance of sliding after Marnus had gone (who it was you who picked, ironically)man was hoping for at least one of those two for this round.
Ranji had a longer FC career and his average stood as the highest for decades even though he started in the 1890s. And he revolutionised leg side play and stuff too. So he was seen as Grace's successor. Duleep was just a fine cricketer who sadly didn't play much.I have wanted to ask this for some time, so since both have been picked which one of Ranji and Duleep is generally considered better and by how much?
Nobody talks about Duleep really. Ranji gets rated very highlyI have wanted to ask this for some time, so since both have been picked which one of Ranji and Duleep is generally considered better and by how much?
Criteria | Budget | Remaining |
Matches | 500 | 454 |
Runs | 30000 | 28296 |
Wickets | 1000 | 808 |