• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Brian lara vs steve smith

Who is better batsmen


  • Total voters
    23

Johan

International Coach
Sri lanka of 2025 blasted nz at home. Sri lanka of 95 blasted nz in nz and pak in pak
Sri Lanka bowling average in 1990s below 1996: 38.25
current Sri Lanka bowling average: 33.61

can
we stop this bullshit of pretending Sachin, Lara or Viv faced better bowling on average than Smith? Yes, they faced more elite attacks, but the average attack Smith faces is objectively better.
 
Last edited:

Johan

International Coach
Your current top 10 list ?
no order, newer to older

Smith, Sachin, Sobers, Hutton, Bradman, Hammond, Headley, Sutcliffe, Hobbs

No order, last is hard, I've thought about Gavaskar, Pollock, Chappell, Viv and Lara.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
no order, newer to older

Smith, Sachin, Sobers, Hutton, Bradman, Hammond, Headley, Sutcliffe, Hobbs

No order, last is hard, I've thought about Gavaskar, Pollock, Chappell, Viv and Lara.
Why are Hammond and Sutcliffe coloured, and Hutton and Hobbs aren’t?
 

Top