PlayerComparisons
International Captain
You don’t think his 156 was an ATG innings? Idk manYeah, that century was Great (not ATG for me though), but was rather off for the rest of the series
You don’t think his 156 was an ATG innings? Idk manYeah, that century was Great (not ATG for me though), but was rather off for the rest of the series
The problem is Lara's away record is more padded than it first appears with not the same degree of quality smattering against better pacers.Lara's record in Aus is probably the only meh part of his stats overall. Only crossed 50 4 times in 27 innings after his first series there. Extremely rocks or diamonds.
Best player since Bradman at setting games up when he got going? That was his great gift. Daddy hundreds at a good tick. He was a patchy player in tough conditions but a proper monster at going big on his day.Because his big knocks take the headlines.
For example, his 400 came after a series where he largely failed. Same for tons in series in Australia.
That’s why I mentioned the year as well.I don't think the bolded ones count as ATGs in their prime at all tbh. Bond was on debut and Pollock was a shadow of himself by then.
Sure. But it hid his inconsistency otherwise.Best player since Bradman at setting games up when he got going? That was his great gift. Daddy hundreds at a good tick.
Pollock before that test 377 @ 22.09, Pollock after that test 44 @ 34.43, 73 SR.Gayle broke Pollock at Antigua in 2005 and Pollock was never the same again
AgreeSure. But it hid his inconsistency otherwise.
A very poor opinion given what Lara did against McGrath in 99.Ponting comfortably better against high speed pacers and around even against medium pacers.
Lara had 99 vs peak McGrath. That series on itself was better Ponting's career.McGrath taken his wicket more than 15 times, i don't think any blower dominated ponting like this.
A Great innings, but not quite ATG to me.You don’t think his 156 was an ATG innings? Idk man
WhyA Great innings, but not quite ATG to me.
On 2nd thoughts, yeah it was ATG
Yes but Ponting never got to destroy McGrath.A very poor opinion given what Lara did against McGrath in 99.
It's like saying in a Lara vs Tendulkar discussion Tendulkar's runs against Steyn doesn't counts since Lara never got to face himYes but Ponting never got to destroy McGrath.