Sliferxxxx
First Class Debutant
Lately I'm starting to think you're anti Imran...Disappointed. And you accuse me of having an anti Lara agenda.

Lately I'm starting to think you're anti Imran...Disappointed. And you accuse me of having an anti Lara agenda.
Or maybe, maybe I don't have an agenda. Just my own views like a regular dude.Lately I'm starting to think you're anti Imran...![]()
Would it be better if it was Cricket Web: All-Time Very Good?Respectively, these adjectives you use are worse than CricketWeb titles.
Not as snappy.Would it be better if it was Cricket Web: All-Time Very Good?
I find it tough to say Sachin isn’t a genius.You can teach someone to try and copy a master. You can't for a genius.
Geniuses:
Lara
Viv
Wasim
Murali
Masters:
Tendulkar
McGrath
Kallis
Gavaskar
Let's pretend this is true.You can teach someone to try and copy a master. You can't for a genius.
Geniuses:
Lara
Viv
Wasim
Murali
Masters:
Tendulkar
McGrath
Kallis
Gavaskar
I'm not using this as some sort of measuring stick. It's more just a categorisation of interest.Let's pretend this is true.
Why does that even matter? You don't get extra "can't copy me" tallies in the scorebook.
Fair. But in how he played it was quite textbook.I find it tough to say Sachin isn’t a genius.
He was a prodigy from the school days. He has always been technically perfect.
There is a video from 1995 where Sunil Gavaskar saying he would be disappointed if Sachin didn’t end up with at least 15000 runs and 40 centuries.
True.Fair. But in how he played it was quite textbook.