Unfair ? If you were an employer, would you keep such an employee who is confrontrational (although right on some occastions) and often puts you in difficult positions ?social said:If the issue was unfair dismissal - yep
Under employment law in a lot of countries, an employer would have to prove that an employee was solely to blame for even the biggest f-ups before being able to dismiss said employee for free. In this case, everyone agrees that Hair followed the cricket laws to the letter, so he would have a very strong case to argue. In a courtroom, the ICC would not stand a chance.Sanz said:Unfair ? If you were an employer, would you keep such an employee who is confrontrational (although right on some occastions) and often puts you in difficult positions ?
Whats disgraceful is his repeated racist behavior.SpaceMonkey said:If Hair retired he'd lose out on 4 years or so of pay, why shouldnt he ask for compensation? Yes his wording of his email is aggressive, but we know thats the type of person Hair is.
He's not a racist, dispite what people here keep saying (which is DISGRACEFUL btw).
Couldn't he have waited until it came to his part of the resolution of the situation? Certainly if he had confidence on his Own actions and stance he would be assured of a fair hand by the ICC, until after atleast Inzamam's hearing.SpaceMonkey said:If Hair retired he'd lose out on 4 years or so of pay, why shouldnt he ask for compensation? Yes his wording of his email is aggressive, but we know thats the type of person Hair is.
I would suggest leave it silentstriker as calling hair a racist is going to prove nothingsilentstriker said:Whats disgraceful is his repeated racist behavior.