• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Breaking News* CWBCC Suspends Two Players

PY

International Coach
Are you saying Rodgie isn't respected? If you weren't a Blue, I'd be calling for a ban.
 

Adamc

Cricketer Of The Year
PY said:
Are you saying Rodgie isn't respected?
Yeah, I think that was the clear implication.

My post was in response to some random insults which Rodgie directed at me earlier in this thread. I don't think what I said was particularly malicious, but whatever.
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Matteh said:
One was a massive outburst against everyone that dared speak. One was talking about the rather soft retirement of a respected player. Seems fair. :blink:
More to the point, these suspensions are consistent with the OLD punishments for players who broke the code of conduct. 2 and 3 games. Borcich and Blackman got what, 20 and 40 games? Hardly consistent, and the repeat offences argument doesn't really apply as both these players have been suspended before as well.

You could perhaps justify longer bans for Borcich and Blackman on a combination of repeat offences and severity of offences, but I don't see how that justifies multiplying the standard punishment 10 or 20 times.
 

James90

Cricketer Of The Year
FaaipDeOiad said:
More to the point, these suspensions are consistent with the OLD punishments for players who broke the code of conduct. 2 and 3 games. Borcich and Blackman got what, 20 and 40 games? Hardly consistent, and the repeat offences argument doesn't really apply as both these players have been suspended before as well.
First suspension for me.
 

PY

International Coach
Adamc said:
Yeah, I think that was the clear implication.

My post was in response to some random insults which Rodgie directed at me earlier in this thread. I don't think what I said was particularly malicious, but whatever.
Man, the world can't operate without the use of smileys now!

I was being tongue-in-cheek. :p
 

Buddhmaster

International Captain
I don't remember ever being suspended for CWXI offences? I didn't play some early games because I got a CW ban, but that was nothing to do with CWXI.
 

Adamc

Cricketer Of The Year
PY said:
Man, the world can't operate without the use of smileys now!

I was being tongue-in-cheek. :p
Haha. I thought you misinterpreted my post because I didn't use a smiley either.
 

Magrat Garlick

Rather Mad Witch
FaaipDeOiad said:
No it's not. He got two games for abusing Dauth, I believe.
Now I'm completely confused. You're talking about the abuse in this thread? That's what he got two games for now, in the same batch as Stedman.
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Samuel_Vimes said:
Now I'm completely confused. You're talking about the abuse in this thread? That's what he got two games for now, in the same batch as Stedman.
No, I'm saying he has been banned for two matches for abusing Dauth (I think, not sure about the player) in the past. This is his second ban. Demeza himself mentions that he's been banned before earlier in this thread.
 

Magrat Garlick

Rather Mad Witch
FaaipDeOiad said:
No, I'm saying he has been banned for two matches for abusing Dauth (I think, not sure about the player) in the past. This is his second ban. Demeza himself mentions that he's been banned before earlier in this thread.
OK, you're his teammate so should probably know. Honestly can't remember it tho.
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Samuel_Vimes said:
OK, you're his teammate so should probably know. Honestly can't remember it tho.
No offence, but if you're going to be deciding bans for players shouldn't you be aware of their past record? :p
 

Magrat Garlick

Rather Mad Witch
FaaipDeOiad said:
No offence, but if you're going to be deciding bans for players shouldn't you be aware of their past record? :p
There isn't a ban register yet. Should we stop banning people because of that? :p
 

Top