Better all rounder in ODIs?

[DrWolverine]

and if Afridi averaged 30 and Kallis 45?

30(25) or 45(60)

That’s a good question

It depends on the match situation

 

[Johan]

30(25) or 45(60)

That’s a good question

It depends on the match situation

45(60) might lose you more games than it wins you

 

[sayon basak]

Two different types of batsmen.
Kallis is a better batsman imo.

Yeah that is just wrong.

 

[Thala_0710]

30(25) or 45(60)

That’s a good question

It depends on the match situation

Yup depends on the era and match conditions. But on avg I would think 30(25) would be better imo for the team

 

[Bolo.]

Viv is about as much of an AR as Pollock/Kapil, and I reckon he would probably win this comfortably if we were voting for best player.

 

[DrWolverine]

Viv :118 wickets in 135 innings at an average of 35

 

[andruid]

The disrespect on Chris Gayle here

 

[sayon basak]

Viv :118 wickets in 135 innings at an average of 35

Chris Gayle deserves a mention too.

 

[Cricket Bliss]

Yup depends on the era and match conditions. But on avg I would think 30(25) would be better imo for the team

Nah. It is not a 20 or 30 over game. Batting long is important... as far as the situation don't demand 45 (60) is better...if the opponent was 35 (30) I would have rated it better.

 

[Fuller Pilch]

are you picking 30 avg striking at 130 or 60 average striking at 65

It depends where they bat.

 

[sayon basak]

are you picking 30 avg striking at 130 or 60 average striking at 65

45 avg striking at 97.5 is better than both imo.

 

[Pap Finn Keighl]

Kapil > Klusner > Rest.