• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

best team in world cricket right now

the best


  • Total voters
    26
  • Poll closed .

S.Kennedy

International Vice-Captain
If England are indeed so poor, how **** does that make Oz then?

England win the Ashes in a fairly one sided series: England on tour beat a Steyn-less Proteas: Australia home are beaten by a Steyn-less Proteas!!
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
If England are indeed so poor, how **** does that make Oz then?

England win the Ashes in a fairly one sided series: England on tour beat a Steyn-less Proteas: Australia home are beaten by a Steyn-less Proteas!!

The real roughie for Australia was that they got beat by a 10 man 3 bowler team.
 

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
If England are indeed so poor, how **** does that make Oz then?

England win the Ashes in a fairly one sided series: England on tour beat a Steyn-less Proteas: Australia home are beaten by a Steyn-less Proteas!!
Steyn and Philander in England's case tbf, big difference missing your premier fast bowler vs. both your two premier bowlers.

That said, I'd only have Australia very marginally ahead of England as of this moment, it's not a big gap.
 

S.Kennedy

International Vice-Captain
Steyn and Philander in England's case tbf, big difference missing your premier fast bowler vs. both your two premier bowlers.

That said, I'd only have Australia very marginally ahead of England as of this moment, it's not a big gap.
I'll give you the fact that S.A (and India) might have the edge over England, but there is no way I can have Australia above England. If we are accepting that England are poorer than S.A - because of the Steyn factor, etc. - then that literally knocks Oz outside of all contention here. We should not even be discussing Australia as they were beaten with a home advantage!!
 

centurymaker

Cricketer Of The Year
Broad is clearly a better bowler nowadays than Anderson. Really impressed with his bowling. Troubles batsmen even on flatest of pitches with seam and/or swing.
 

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
England > Australia, no argument there, although Australia are favourites to win the next Ashes series at home.
I'm not convinced, both sides would likely win vs. one another at home, both sides seems to play well in SA & Australia the more impressive of the two sides touring NZ. Outside of that they're pretty even for mine.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Broad is clearly a better bowler nowadays than Anderson. Really impressed with his bowling. Troubles batsmen even on flatest of pitches with seam and/or swing.
I'm not really across what he did the summer, but I think the consensus was that he was likely the best Test bowler in the world at the start of the year.
 

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Changed your thoughts on Pakistan?
Not unless you believe that one swallow makes a summer, especially considering they still lost the game against a relatively weak Australian side, and also given it's only weeks since their embarrassing 2-0 annihilation against NZ & not long from their previous lost to the Windies.

While they did show plenty of guts & resolve in that chase, if we're honest they were always batting from a long way behind, which tends to make it a lot easier mentally. As the commentators rightly pointed out, in those massive chases, it becomes harder the closer you get.

What about you? Have they gone up in your rankings after that loss?
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Pakistan really impressed me this game. But you don't get any points for moral victories. Remains to be seen whether they can carry on this standard of performance through the rest of the series. It should only get easier for them from here on in. They'll be better acclimatized to the conditions, the Melbourne and Sydney pitches should help Shah a bit more, and they know that Australia are quite beatable. Amir and Riaz have looked good, and the younger batsmen have shown they can score runs here. They need to hang on to their catches, basically.
 

Flem274*

123/5
the backlash against pakistan has just been typical of the "you're amazing or terrible, no middle ground" attitude current CW has tbh. team ratings are written like click bait.

pakistan played very well in england, mostly slaughtered the windies until the windies pulled out their once a year test performance then in a shock announcement an asian side got slaughtered in NZ

Last summer NZ were #125463 in the world, before them I think it was India who were the worst ever and they will be again once they leave home. Australia are the worst team in the world whenever they go to England or Asia and England are the worst whenever they play in Australia or drop a test to WI/random asian side at home

There is no clear #1 and the current trend of ranking Pakistan below the Solomon Islands is dumb
 

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
the backlash against pakistan has just been typical of the "you're amazing or terrible, no middle ground" attitude current CW has tbh. team ratings are written like click bait.
Only in Pakistan's case there is a middle ground, since most seem to be currently ranking them about 5th in the world out of the 10 Test teams. I'd say number 5 out of 10 is pretty much middle-ground isn't it?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I haven't read anyone arguing that NZ, SL or the Windies should be higher, so if there's anything extreme going on, it's your observation about it being black and white :p
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Pakistan really impressed me this game. But you don't get any points for moral victories. Remains to be seen whether they can carry on this standard of performance through the rest of the series. It should only get easier for them from here on in. They'll be better acclimatized to the conditions, the Melbourne and Sydney pitches should help Shah a bit more, and they know that Australia are quite beatable. Amir and Riaz have looked good, and the younger batsmen have shown they can score runs here. They need to hang on to their catches, basically.
It's also important not to realise that the Test wasn't quite as close as it looked. Aus batted ****, threw away a lot of wickets (2nd innings pretty much all declaration wickets) and still won by 40 runs & 5 wickets.

Good to see some fight though
 

Zinzan

Request Your Custom Title Now!
It's also important not to realise that the Test wasn't quite as close as it looked. Aus batted ****, threw away a lot of wickets (2nd innings pretty much all declaration wickets) and still won by 40 runs & 5 wickets.
I think this is fair actually.
 

TNT

Banned
It's also important not to realise that the Test wasn't quite as close as it looked. Aus batted ****, threw away a lot of wickets (2nd innings pretty much all declaration wickets) and still won by 40 runs & 5 wickets.

Good to see some fight though
Agreed, some good fight by Pakistan but Australia had dropped down a gear or two and were looking to cruise home.
 

Top