• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Best ever medium pacer?

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Please take note of the forum rules:

Digging Threads - Please do not dig up old threads unless there is something of value being contributed by the dig. Pointless digs may lead to an official warning and excessive digging and spamming of the forum may lead to an instant seven day ban.
TBH, I think the h post will mean this thread might end-up the most dug in history, both for mundane and sensible reasons.

BTW - did I ever say this? All due respect to Matt of '79, I don't think there's any point in trying to decide who was the best bowler who bowled at a certain speed (particularly given that for the vast majority of cricket's history we could only guess at what speeds bowlers were bowling at). And we see that by the "no way was so-and-so a medium-pacer". Bowlers' speeds vary, both over a career and ball-to-ball.

TBH, anyway, virtually no medium-pace bowlers have ever been successful at Test-cricket, you need to be medium-fast at the very quickest. Even they've only had small numbers who can purvey it with success, and no-one really recent. Fast-medium is mostly a requistite.
 

JBMAC

State Captain
TBH, anyway, virtually no medium-pace bowlers have ever been successful at Test-cricket, you need to be medium-fast at the very quickest. Even they've only had small numbers who can purvey it with success, and no-one really recent. Fast-medium is mostly a requistite.
With some 49,000 posts this statement really proves you have absolutely NO idea about the game of Cricket and it's History.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
No, it doesn't. No-one knew how fast bowlers bowled before 1998. So we can only guess at what was medium and medium-fast.
 

JBMAC

State Captain
It was pretty simple

If a ball came through at a good clip and shaved you it was bloody fast
If a ball came through and you were able to score anything from 1-3 runs that was medium pace
If a ball came through and you hit a four or six then the bowler was a slow/spinner.
No Science involved just that[you Knew
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Yes. IOW, all judgement was on the part of the batsmen. And batsmen are well-known to be notoriously poor judges of speed, when scientific implements make their proper judgements.
 

neville cardus

International Debutant
Stop mentioning mcgrath he was medium fast. Averaged about 130s.
He was probably faster than that. He did himself no favours in the speed stakes by employing that steepling length which, as a hallmark of his bowling, was eclipsed only by the consistency with which he held it. Although greatly unsettling (chiefly for said metronomic steadiness), it completely duped the speed gun.

I do not know how closely you study, and how much credibility you give to, that delightful piece of technology creatively dubbed "Hawkeye", but it shows (with what may be called conclusiveness only if you believe in its fabled accuracy) that a cricket ball, when trundled, loses an enormous amount of pace after hitting the deck.

This always seemed the case with Glenn McGrath. Had a he bowled a foot or so fuller, he might not have been as great or as temperate a bowler, but he would have maintained his status as a genuine speedster for far longer than he did.

Still, whatever the facts about his speed and how much of it he lost after his deliveries introduced themselves to cricket wickets, he hardly deserves mention in a thread devoted to medium-pacers.
 
Last edited:

neville cardus

International Debutant
Bedser must have been medium pace, as Evans stood up to the stumps when keeping to him.
That was only because it made Bedser, like Tate before him, feel more secure. He loved the immediate slap of the leather of the ball against the leather of the gloves. It fired him.
 

neville cardus

International Debutant
only person I rate as express now is Lee.
Tait is but hes not playing
If you are going to claim fast-bowling honours for Tait, you really ought to do the same for Dale Steyn, Morne Morkel and Mitchell Johnson. The last-mentioned often eclipsed Tait's speed during the recent Test series with India.
 
Last edited:

neville cardus

International Debutant
Annoyingly, in the case of Shoaib, I am forced for once to agree with the odious bond21. The Rawalpindi Express has been as inconsistent speed-wise of late as he has been inconsistent temperament-wise throughout his career.
 

Pup Clarke

Cricketer Of The Year
Still classifies as "Right Arm Fast" IMO, he was still bowling deliveries in the early 150s in the series v India.
 
Last edited:

Top