Lets be honest here Amitamits said:Ponting-6
Hayden, Dravid, Lara-5
G.Smith-1
and no votes for sachin :O
my vote and debate is yet to come. it will come after i c 30 votes.
Sachin has averaged less than 45 since 2001.amits said:and no votes for sachin :O
Not to mention AA!Rik said:Ignoring Dravid and Laxman et al.
It was a good spell of bowling, yes, but i feel i am oblidged to tell you to crawl up in a ball and die, or at least in the short term be viciously mauled by a large polar bear.marc71178 said:Not to mention AA!
But we're talking aout batting, so what's that got to do with it?! :PMr. Ponting said:It was a good spell of bowling, yes, but i feel i am oblidged to tell you to crawl up in a ball and die, or at least in the short term be viciously mauled by a large polar bear.
Well Amit, i hope ur debate is not about the usual topic "patriotism"amits said:Ponting-6
Hayden, Dravid, Lara-5
G.Smith-1
and no votes for sachin :O
my vote and debate is yet to come. it will come after i c 30 votes.
I agree. Hayden for me.there's something about 3 consecutive years of over 1000 runs that just screams "Pretty Damn Good".
Which I think is quite accurate.Mr Mxyzptlk said:On a points system of 5,4,3,2,1,0 since 2001...
ML Hayden 9
BC Lara 9
MP Vaughan 5
SR Tendulkar 4
RT Ponting 4
HH Gibbs 4
R Dravid 3
GC Smith 3
JH Kallis 2
DPMD Jaywardene 1
S Chanderpaul 1
Woss dat, den?Linda said:The suspence
Apart from Vaughan.Mister Wright said:Which I think is quite accurate.
Uh, I dunno. I dont think I get it.:duh:Richard said:Woss dat, den?
:P