Maybe he would, but that's just speculation....we won't know for real and so can't really judge him that way.Jnr. said:Aussie Beater, I think RP has improved his technique significantly, he is a lot tighter now than in his younger years and definitely more focused mentally. If he was to go back and play them (Wasim, Waqar, Ambrose, Walsh) now, I think he would do a lot better.
No bias Im sure.michael_vaughan said:well i think the best batter after Lara and Sachin is michael vaughan
jane
You're crazy, Don!!Don said:well my answer is and will always be shiv the tiger narine chanderpaul.in my eyes hes better than lara.yes i saud it i think hes better than lara.go on now inslut me becuz of my craziness
i already said it .......... thanx god some one agreednookie_lk said:Sanath Jayasuriya !!!!!!!!!!
oh yeah sorry i forget that ur always correctmarc71178 said:Even if you're both so wrong it's crazy!
I guess people are still waiting for kallis to score the really big runs vs the really good teams...and as for Hayden, I think people cant see past the aggressive nature of his play, which isnt in keeping with the traditional view of how an opener should bat.a massive zebra said:Dravid, Hayden, Ponting and Kallis for me. In that order.
I find it amazing that so people under-rate Hayden and Kallis.
Hayden has scored a mountain of runs all over the world and Kallis has maintained a Test average of 50 for a long time, yet many people hold Thorpe and Fleming in higher regard.
In what would be Neil's fourth group...Barney Rubble said:Also, where do people rate Sehwag in the scheme of things?
Jayasuriya isn't even in the top 20, let alone top 3 batsmen in the world.nookie_lk said:oh yeah sorry i forget that ur always correct
Not quite sure what you mean - are you having a light dig at Neil for forgetting Sehwag or are you having a light dig at me for not realising he just wasn't in the list which would have answered my question?Sudeep said:In what would be Neil's fourth group...