Not in this case. Waqar for me.shortpitched713 said:Allrounder beats specialist.
Waqar was an all-time great bowler. Kapil was a very good bowler and a handy late-order batsman. Kapil was a superior fielder.silentstriker said:I am absolutely astonished that its tied at this point. I wouldn't have given Dev a chance, and personally I would have voted for Waqar easily...maybe I am missing something?
But Waqar IMO was a far far superior bowler. Doesn't that offset Kapil's batting and his WC?adharcric said:Waqar was an all-time great bowler. Kapil was a very good bowler and a handy late-order batsman. Kapil was a superior fielder.
So far, it's advantage Waqar, just.
Kapil captained his side to a World Cup. That tilts it in Kapil's favor IMO.
The only reason Kapil's batting alone doesn't put him ahead of Waqar is because Waqar was a far (only one, not two fars) superior bowler.silentstriker said:But Waqar IMO was a far far superior bowler. Doesn't that offset Kapil's batting and his WC?
He's knocked out.gunner said:wheres shoaib akhtar?
Not quite as simple as that.Turbinator said:Yes Kapil is in the lead...
Kapil was a better batsmen, fielder, and captain... while Waqar was only a better bowler!
LOL work with me here... this is a way to lure the people who haven't voted yet to vote for Dev!adharcric said:Not quite as simple as that.