Battle of the Subcontinent

[Tony Blade]

Murali

 

[SA]

Muttiah Muralitharan

 

[aussie]

Murali

 

[Anil]

murali

 

[silentstriker]

19-2 Murali

Round 2, Battle 16

Kumar Sangakkara
62 tests @ 48.93, 10 centuries, 22 fifties, HS: 287

vs.

Inzamam Ul-Haq
113 matches @ 50.88, 25 centuries, 44 fifties, HS: 329

 

[nightprowler10]

Good matchup. Inzamam for me. BTW, that picture looks more like a turd than anything else.......Inzamam's doesn't look right either.

 

[silentstriker]

Good matchup. Inzamam for me. BTW, that picture looks more like a turd than anything else.......Inzamam's doesn't look right either.

 

[Magrat Garlick]

Inzy

 

[silentstriker]

Vote people! This is the last battle of this round, I am anxious to run my random generator again to see who I can screw over in the next round.

 

[PhoenixFire]

Sangakkara

 

[Goughy]

Tougher tha it looks but clearly Inzi

 

[Fusion]

Inzi

 

[Mahindinho]

As much as I'm a fan of Kumar's, it's got to be Aloo

Inzy's just been one of the world's best players for such a long time, whereas Sangakkara's only really come to prominence recently.

In two or three years' time, I'm hoping that the answer would be Sanga.

 

[Slifer]

Inzi

 

[adharcric]

Aloo

 

[BoyBrumby]

I'm going with Sangakarra. Not the greatest keeper, but solid enough & averages all-but 49 after 62 tests. Inzi makes batting look ridiculously easy, but loses marks for his running & fielding.

 

[cricketboy29]

Inzamam..never seen anyone else who made batting looks so easy.

 

[oz_fan]

Inzi

 

[aussie]

I'm going Sangakkara cause i think the bloke is on his way to becoming the greatest keeper/batsman to come out of the sub-continent, while Inzi even though he is been a great batsman they have been a few better than him to come out of that region.

 

[Perm]

Inzamam-ul-Haq