• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Battle of The Spinners

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Have to go with Saqlain, but I love Ironmonger's story: no forefinger on his spinning hand, absolute ferret & debuted in tests at 45! The sort of curiousity that only cricket could throw up. :)
 

silentstriker

The Wheel is Forever
Unfortunately, I have to confess ignorance of the other two guys (outside of cricinfo page), so I'll go with Prasanna. If someone can educate me on either of the others, maybe I'll change my vote.
 

chaminda_00

Hall of Fame Member
Schwarz was part of SA's spinning trio of Faulkner. Vogler and himself. They were the bowlers that got South Africa some creditability on the international stage.

Bobby Peel was an olden spinner for England who has the best bowling average out of all spin bowlers in the history of cricket, unless you include Iverson 5 Tests.
 

adharcric

International Coach
Boils down to Peel and Prasanna. I only rate the old-timers if they are rated very highly by contemporaries because there were so many bowlers back then who averaged 18.
Peel is rated highly but I'm not sure about very highly. Prasanna for now.
 

The Sean

Cricketer Of The Year
All good spinners, without any of them being genuine contenders to go a long way in this. Peel's record is fantastic, but he played in an era when a lot of bowlers had amazing figures, and Schwarz did a lot for SA in terms of establishing them on the international stage (great S/R too), but for achievements over a long period of time, and in an era when batsmen were averaging 45 rather than 25, I'll go with Prasanna.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Very hard to compare across the eras. Peel's figures are quite remarkable to modern eyes, but one must partly attribute them to the pitches he played on. Prasanna's figures are more modest, but he did play quite a lot of his cricket on covered pitches, which have somewhat neutered finger-spinners.

I think I have to go with Peel tho, as he was arguably the greatest of his contemporaries, whereas Prasanna certainly bowled during an era in which there were better spinners than him. I've always been of the opinion that being the best of one's era is all one can reasonably expect of any sportsperson.
 

Top