-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
Battle of the Cricketers
- Thread starter Jamee999
- Start date
age_master
Hall of Fame Member
Bradman
Tom Halsey
International Coach
After a slight diversion...
Viv. Bradders shouldn't be in it.
Viv. Bradders shouldn't be in it.
archie mac
International Coach
Bradman
Barney Rubble
International Coach
Bradman - I've voted against him once already, twice would be too much.
chaminda_00
Hall of Fame Member
Richards, can't vote for someone who shouldn't be in the comp, looking forward to the real final between Richards and Lara
Robertinho
Cricketer Of The Year
6-4 to Bradman so far.
It's interesting to see how people are so quick so vote against Bradman - 'he shouldn't be in the competition'... why? He's a cricketer isn't he? The greatest? Indeed, it was clear that Bradman & Sobers would dominate, but blame Jamee for not having the foresight to remove them. They're in the competition, and if they're so great that "they shouldn't have been in the comp", then it's nonsensical to vote against them. Personally, I can't fathom how there was as great a cricketer as Bradman, so he's become almost surreal to me. I think people are voting against not Bradman the cricketer, but Bradman the myth, the legend.
But keeping in mind he played the same game that we play today and still managed to score 6996 runs at 99.94 (which is so amazing it's ridiculous), there's absolutely nothing in my mind that could ever justify me voting against him.
Bradman by miles and miles.
It's interesting to see how people are so quick so vote against Bradman - 'he shouldn't be in the competition'... why? He's a cricketer isn't he? The greatest? Indeed, it was clear that Bradman & Sobers would dominate, but blame Jamee for not having the foresight to remove them. They're in the competition, and if they're so great that "they shouldn't have been in the comp", then it's nonsensical to vote against them. Personally, I can't fathom how there was as great a cricketer as Bradman, so he's become almost surreal to me. I think people are voting against not Bradman the cricketer, but Bradman the myth, the legend.
But keeping in mind he played the same game that we play today and still managed to score 6996 runs at 99.94 (which is so amazing it's ridiculous), there's absolutely nothing in my mind that could ever justify me voting against him.
Bradman by miles and miles.
honestbharani
Whatever it takes!!!
I will continue my trend of voting against Sobers and Bradman. So, Richards it is.
