• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Battle of the Cricketers

steds

Hall of Fame Member
superkingdave said:
Statham was always better than Trueman
Of course. Statham's first-class career bowling average of 16.37 is the lowest among any bowler since 1900 who has taken over 2000 first-class wickets. How he didn't get in when I nominated him was a complete sham. Which is why I abstain
 

Robertinho

Cricketer Of The Year
Warne, of course, he's truly a great of the game. He's a great character, and I think when he congratulated Pietersen on his 158, he showed what a great guy he is.
 

Jamee999

Hall of Fame Member
18-3 to Warne

ROUND TWO ----- ----- BATTLE THIRTEEN

MA Holding (West Indies) (RHB, RF)



WR Hammond (England) (RHB, RMF)

 

twctopcat

International Regular
I've never seen Hammond and although he is generally classed as one of the all time greats, there is something about Mikey and WI quicks in general. Holding for me.
 

Top