• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Battle of the Cricketers

Anil

Hall of Fame Member
twctopcat said:
As much as i rate Hutton there is something about Gavaskar and his record against the windies that wins it for me. Gavaskar for me.
now that's being objective....good job! :)
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Think I'll have to go with Sir Leonard too. Gavaskar may've scored more runs, but Hutton had six years taken out of his peak due to WW2 & a injury sustained in service left him with a left arm 2" shorter than his right. I think it's reasonable to assume this must've hindered him somewhat.

Hutton
 

twctopcat

International Regular
Anil said:
now that's being objective....good job! :)
Yeah i know. Even more so because my dad would probably kill me if he found i voted this way - him being a yorkshireman and all! :D
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Gavaskar.

To play that many Tests back in that era (when lets face it, you don't get 12 or more games every year) and still maintain an average of that level is an extremely good achievement.
 

Top