Prince EWS
Global Moderator
At least.Does Michael Bevan average 48 in this timeline or what
At least.Does Michael Bevan average 48 in this timeline or what
On this, @Spark made the best argument for having Wade do it -- that it's basically a gateway to dropping him.I think it would be better than having Wade do it
bevan averages 48 or above in literally every single possible timeline except for the one that actually happened, the poor angry bastardDoes Michael Bevan average 48 in this timeline or what
I absolutely agree that Bevan would've been a Test success with even slightly different circumstances. But it's not like they were ignoring him while cycling through failures; the blokes they picked in his place earned their call-ups and did really well.Phil Emery, the keeper Australia rushed to Pakistan for a Test
A sudden call-up, a chaotic tour, a broken thumb - Phil Emery relives his momentous first and last Test for Australia in 1994www.thecricketmonthly.com
emery in this piece argues that had the Pakistan tour where Bevan scored runs been broadcast into Australia, his career would have been different. I'm not sure I buy that, but to me, like Maxwell not getting a home test, Bevan's test career being over at 27 is absolutely nuts. Everyone else in that generation of australian batsmen who got games in their early 20s and basically failed to secure a place, got another chances down the track, except for Bevan (and I guess Law). Truly nuts
Yeah mostly all this. It's not like Rob Quiney was being selected ahead of Bevan. Everyone who was given a run instead was just about as deserving.I absolutely agree that Bevan would've been a Test success with even slightly different circumstances. But it's not like they were ignoring him while cycling through failures; the blokes they picked in his place earned their call-ups and did really well.
I find it hard to actually criticise his non-selection much even though I think he could've averaged 50 in Test cricket and very likely would've averaged at least 45. This feels like a really weird position, probably because it is, but I stand by it.
You could definitely argue that he should've got a recall instead of Lehmann or Mark Waugh or Blewett etc at various points but I don't think the selection itself was disastrous. You just can't afford to be unlucky when the competition is so good.
Hussey too.But honestly, it's pretty hard to drop someone from a lineup like this:
Hayden
Langer
Ponting
Martyn
Waugh/Clarke
Lehmann/Katich
Gilchrist+
You're looking at possibly the only top 7 in history that all averaged 40+ over their careers (with Ponting, Hayden and Waugh averaging 50+). Not much room in there for trying new players.
I excluded him because his time came when Bevan really couldn't push to be included due to age, but yes, as I said, ridiculous.Hussey too.
There’s been at least one other more recently than that one tbhBut honestly, it's pretty hard to drop someone from a lineup like this:
Hayden
Langer
Ponting
Martyn
Waugh/Clarke
Lehmann/Katich
Gilchrist+
You're looking at possibly the only top 7 in history that all averaged 40+ over their careers (with Ponting, Hayden and Waugh averaging 50+). Not much room in there for trying new players.
Maybe I should have clarified that they could bat outside the subcontinentThere’s been at least one other more recently than that one tbh
Well they won an away series in Australia...Maybe I should have clarified that they could bat outside the subcontinent
Clarke debuted in tests after Bevan played his last international as well FTR, but fair call.I excluded him because his time came when Bevan really couldn't push to be included due to age, but yes, as I said, ridiculous.
Never happened. Lies. Stop spewing your fake news that Australia played cricket during the year after Newlands.Well they won an away series in Australia...