dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
Not sure di Venuto was test quality tbh
Yeah I reckon he could've been a gun ODI bat but he doesn't really belong with the rest of the names in terms of being a Test prospect IMO.Not sure di Venuto was test quality tbh
He had pretty ****ing big shoes to fill. Was picked to replace TOTAB.Phil Emery, the keeper Australia rushed to Pakistan for a Test
A sudden call-up, a chaotic tour, a broken thumb - Phil Emery relives his momentous first and last Test for Australia in 1994www.thecricketmonthly.com
emery in this piece argues that had the Pakistan tour where Bevan scored runs been broadcast into Australia, his career would have been different. I'm not sure I buy that, but to me, like Maxwell not getting a home test, Bevan's test career being over at 27 is absolutely nuts. Everyone else in that generation of australian batsmen who got games in their early 20s and basically failed to secure a place, got another chance down the track, except for Bevan (and I guess Law). Truly nuts
I even mentioned this when I suggested he open. All the cards in favour of my argument for it were on the table.For years he was Tim "only one First Class century" Paine, but he was opening the batting during said innings.
What does this mean? Absolutely nothing really, just thought I would put it out there
And Ajit Agarkar scored a 100 in his only test at Lords. You read what you wanna read.For years he was Tim "only one First Class century" Paine, but he was opening the batting during said innings.
What does this mean? Absolutely nothing really, just thought I would put it out there
Honestly, considering the options (or lack thereof) available, I actually quite like this teamPaine *+
Harris
Labuschagne
Smith
Head
Wade
Green
Starc
Cummins
Hazelwood
Lyon
?
Yeah I probably wouldn't actually play Starc but that's the batting lineup I'd go with.Honestly, considering the options (or lack thereof) available, I actually quite like this team
It could have been worse I guess. Burns' selection is atrocious but hopefully he will just go away when Warner comes back.Yeah I probably wouldn't actually play Starc but that's the batting lineup I'd go with.
As it turns out the lineup has been confirmed and it's this:
Joe Burns
Matthew Wade
Marnus Labuschagne
Steven Smith
Travis Head
Cameron Green
Tim Paine
Pat Cummins
Mitchell Starc
Nathan Lyon
Josh Hazlewood
I think this is a fantastic gateway to dropping Wade.It could have been worse I guess. Burns' selection is atrocious but hopefully he will just go away when Warner comes back.
This could be the beginning of Matty Wade's renaissance as a Test opener. Semi srs.
On the bowling it kinda depends on which Mitchell Starc turns up. If it's the spraygun version then I would definitely have Patto in instead unless all of Damian Hough's mowers break down simultaneouslyYeah I probably wouldn't actually play Starc but that's the batting lineup I'd go with.
As it turns out the lineup has been confirmed and it's this:
Joe Burns
Matthew Wade
Marnus Labuschagne
Steven Smith
Travis Head
Cameron Green
Tim Paine
Pat Cummins
Mitchell Starc
Nathan Lyon
Josh Hazlewood
I think the fact that it's a pink ball Test and Starc is h4x in those may have saved him.On the bowling it kinda depends on which Mitchell Starc turns up. If it's the spraygun version then I would definitely have Patto in instead unless all of Damian Hough's mowers break down simultaneously
Nah this shows how much his versatlility is valued. Travis Head couldn't handle the move to the top of the orderI think this is a fantastic gateway to dropping Wade.
more valuable contribution than I would have expected from the other opening options tbhWade to be caught on the deep midwicket fence for 23(9) in the third over.