Read the thread again buddy. I am assuming wpdavid is referring to England when he said 'Not half as gutting as losing to them in the final when only the rain had kept them in the competition after the group phase. Still hurts ....' Whereas you quoted him and tried to correct him by saying semi final assuming he was talking about NZ? I cannot speak for wpdavid but i assume he was talking about englandDeja moo said:What was wrong in my saying that NZ lost to Pakistan in the Semi final and not the final ?
Richard Rash said:Read the thread again buddy. I am assuming wpdavid is referring to England when he said 'Not half as gutting as losing to them in the final when only the rain had kept them in the competition after the group phase. Still hurts ....' Whereas you quoted him and tried to correct him by saying semi final assuming he was talking about NZ? I cannot speak for wpdavid but i assume he was talking about england
Deja moo said:I assumed he was a Kiwi .He doesnt have location details mentioned & was quoting a post Re:Nz . So a misunderstanding one way or the other I assume.
I was, but it's fair enough that not everyone would know I'm English. No problem.Richard Rash said:Read the thread again buddy. I am assuming wpdavid is referring to England when he said 'Not half as gutting as losing to them in the final when only the rain had kept them in the competition after the group phase. Still hurts ....' Whereas you quoted him and tried to correct him by saying semi final assuming he was talking about NZ? I cannot speak for wpdavid but i assume he was talking about england
Fair enough!Richard Rash said:Beating Aussie doesnt come around that often for us kiwis in any sport let alone cricket so i never live that one down marc
we did lose games with them in the team though, but yeah I understand what you mean.......The last couple of games have had some strange decisions by Ponting etc as well.twctopcat said:In tests there is still daylight but in ODI's there is little in it. Ever since they lost bevan and warne there has been something missing, shown by us beating them in ICC and nz's recent form.
haha you can talk about that all you want but you are no longer the best team in the worldmarc71178 said:Fair enough!
I guess we'll still mention the Webb Ellis for a while to come![]()
the only reason why the aussies arent as far ahead as they should be is because they have selectors stupid enough to drop their best batsman at 34, and not pick him while hes scoring prolifically at the domestic level.Crazy Sam said:the only reason the aussies are not as far ahead is because we suffer batting collapses regularly and have done so since the beginning of the aus-nz-sa series a few years ago. Our openers are in great touch and Ponting is in pretty good nick as well but it seems that if they stay in for a while the others come in facing a spinner first off and struggle. Or, the top order collapses and leave Symonds/Lehmann/Clarke to salvage the innings. Our bowling is pretty good I reckon.
And the reason they will stay ahead is because the selectors were smart enough to bring in Clarke while they could still hold their own and let him mature in a winning team.tooextracool said:the only reason why the aussies arent as far ahead as they should be is because they have selectors stupid enough to drop their best batsman at 34, and not pick him while hes scoring prolifically at the domestic level.
and of course its quite conceivable that bevan can stay fit till the next world cup too. im afraid you dont drop you're best batsman at 34, especially to replace with someone relatively unproven in the ODI game.Scallywag said:And the reason they will stay ahead is because the selectors were smart enough to bring in Clarke while they could still hold their own and let him mature in a winning team.
Aussie ODI cricket will work in 4 year cycles, so expect to see some culling at the end of each World cups. Yes Bevan could still be in the team this year but CA is more worried about how to stay on top, not by how much we win the next game.