• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Aus xi vs WI xi vs SA xi (since 1970)

Which team since 1970 is the strongest?


  • Total voters
    11

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Yeah that's my thinking - it's a bit of a cheat including him, and a lot of a cheat to judge him by his whole career! It should probably be Chanderpaul (or possibly Richardson/Kallicharran) for that final spot.
Sobers swings it totally WIs way. Without him, it's Aus
 

shortpitched713

International Captain
Australia only because of specialist spinner over West Indies. Otherwise, West Indies are equally good, just probably a bit less reliable across conditions. With Sobers, Lara, Viv, they have the absolute best batsmen, but less batting depth due to Gilly (Garner's batting notwithstanding).
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
wickets were minefields in the 86 Windies series (sub 19 RPW), I doubt either Windies or Australia would produce such wickets
Why not? Windies did in 1986.

Sobers, Viv, Greenidge and Lara are better than the rest of the bats. There isn't a big edge either way.


Strawman. In this particular context against high quality spin players and not on mostly spin friendly pitches, yeah Warne will be relatively less effective and more condition dependent than say, Garner. Of course he will still make his impact but he isn't this trumpcard you are portraying him as.
Greenidge isn’t discernibly better than Hayden. Lara and Smith, the same. Richards and Chappell, again similar. Gap between Lloyd and Border/Ponting is easily bigger than the gap between Sobers and Border/Ponting. Plus then you have the Langer and Haynes. Not to mention the absolutely massive gap between Gilchrist and Dujon - which far overshadows any other perceived gap in batting depending on our own personal ratings.

There are also high quality players of pace. In fact, moreso than spin. And Garner is quite a similar bowler to Ambrose. Whereas you have Warne who can bowl all day, and bowls a completely different style to his team, keeping the opponents on their feet. You have Marshall and McGrath ar the aame level, Warne and Ambrose at the same level, Lillee and Garner/Holding at the same level and Cummins a bit behind that. The inclusion of Warne and his spin easily makes up for that gap.
 

Tejretics

Cricket Spectator
Which team is the strongest?

Greenidge
Haynes
Viv
Lara
Lloyd
Sobers
Dujon
Marshall
Holding
Garner
Ambrose

Hayden
Langer
Ponting
Smith
Chappell
Border
Gilchrist
Warne
Cummins
Lillee
McGrath

Barry
Smith
Amla
Pollock
Kallis
De Villiers
De Kock
Pollock
Steyn
Donald
Van der Bijl
If Barry Richards and Graeme Pollock make the South African side, in my mind, so should Mike Procter.

I don’t mind giving de Villiers the gloves to accommodate Procter. Not a natural gloveman (although a wonderful athlete), but it’s not like de Kock is a particularly special gloveman either, and de Villiers batted fine with the gloves.
 

capt_Luffy

International Coach
If Barry Richards and Graeme Pollock make the South African side, in my mind, so should Mike Procter.

I don’t mind giving de Villiers the gloves to accommodate Procter. Not a natural gloveman (although a wonderful athlete), but it’s not like de Kock is a particularly special gloveman either, and de Villiers batted fine with the gloves.
If nothing else, Procter comes in for VVD. I rate VVD, but he doesn't even have a Test cap
 

Top