Pup Clarke
Cricketer Of The Year
Will Jadeja be fit for this series? Will be a tantalising contest him bowling to Smith and Marnus
The other thing that gives me greater confidence in Hazlewood is that his time in the IPL and focus on LO cricket in recent years means he'll have a greater ability to accurately bowl cutters on a slow pitch.In relation to Haze, it’s ludicrous to me that some are binning one of the world’s best bowlers because of past performances
You guys do know that he’s taken a 6 fer in India and I am pretty confident that he’s a better bowler than he was 6 years ago
Anyway, simple fact is that our backup spinners aren’t much good so picking them is likely a waste of a selection
You're going to be picking four quicks on dusty turners ffs. It'll look ridiculous the moment the teamsheet is announced, like England did when they had exactly the same philosophy. Pick Chris Green or Sean Abbott if you have to, at least they can bat, but picking a fourth specialist quick who may well bowl less than Travis Head or Marnus Labuschagne and bat 10 or 11 because "bEsT fOuR bOwLeRs" is just horrible horrible horrible selection policy. It is tantamount to playing with ten men.In relation to Haze, it’s ludicrous to me that some are binning one of the world’s best bowlers because of past performances
You guys do know that he’s taken a 6 fer in India and I am pretty confident that he’s a better bowler than he was 6 years ago
Anyway, simple fact is that our backup spinners aren’t much good so picking them is likely a waste of a selection
Depends on the quality of the bowler surely? NZ binning Wagner to play some absolute spud Pant took apart was hilarious, for instanceYou're going to be picking four quicks on dusty turners ffs. It'll look ridiculous the moment the teamsheet is announced, like England did when they had exactly the same philosophy. Pick Chris Green or Sean Abbott if you have to, at least they can bat, but picking a fourth specialist quick who may well bowl less than Travis Head or Marnus Labuschagne and bat 10 or 11 because "bEsT fOuR bOwLeRs" is just horrible horrible horrible selection policy. It is tantamount to playing with ten men.
@GoodAreasShane see i’m not the only one who wants thisRenshaw, Khawaaaahja, Marnus, Smith, Head, Green, Carey, Cummins, Starc, Lyon, Murphy for me
noting apropos of nothing here that your avi is marcus harrisI will continue doing Agar's PR until he inevitably takes none for 100 in the second innings in Nagpur.
Not unless they bring something different to the attack (which Wagner does) or they take a significant workload on their own.Depends on the quality of the bowler surely? NZ binning Wagner to play some absolute spud Pant took apart was hilarious, for instance
Indian seamers in India post 2015 is a bit like Lyon in Australia. It is really not reflective of how the opposition bowlers of the same type may go. But yes, playing in Feb-March in the northern belt means your seamers will be in business even if the tracks are turners, unless they are slow turners, which means Pujara will bat for 2 days and the draw will suddenly become an option after looking like a 0% chance for the first 3 days.We don’t have 4 frontline quicks
We have 3 plus an highly talented youngster who averages 13 overs per test
Anyway, fun fact time
The Windies won a 5 test series in India with their spinners taking a grand total of 3 wickets
Bumrah averages 15 with the ball at home
Shami 21
Yadav 25
Kumar 26
Siraj 16
Ishant 31
Australia’s quicks are better than them all bar Bumrah but do tell me how you can’t bowl pace in India & how far lesser bowlers will be the answer because they’re slower
My point isn't even really about Hazlewood, it's about the balance of the attack now that that there are lots of options and a fast-bowling all-rounder. It's not a comparable situation. If you pick that many fast bowlers on a track that demands spin, then someone is going to get squeezed out. It's just the hard truth of it and no real reflection on Hazlewood's quality.I do wonder what you think of Hazlewood's 6fer at Bangalore then as far as subcontinental performances go.
I meant in terms of pecking order for the pacers.My point isn't even really about Hazlewood, it's about the balance of the attack now that that there are lots of options and a fast-bowling all-rounder. It's not a comparable situation. If you pick that many fast bowlers on a track that demands spin, then someone is going to get squeezed out. It's just the hard truth of it and no real reflection on Hazlewood's quality.
I think it's well established now that it goes Cummins > Starc > Hazlewood. Particularly given concerns about his fitness and in-game endurance (and the fact that he offers nothing with the bat, even in theory). Starc (and Green) by all reports is going to miss the first Test though so like I said, he's going to get his opportunity.I meant in terms of pecking order for the pacers.
Lol no.We don’t have 4 frontline quicks
We have 3 plus an highly talented youngster who averages 13 overs per test
Anyway, fun fact time
The Windies won a 5 test series in India with their spinners taking a grand total of 3 wickets
Bumrah averages 15 with the ball at home
Shami 21
Yadav 25
Kumar 26
Siraj 16
Ishant 31
Australia’s quicks are better than them all bar Bumrah but do tell me how you can’t bowl pace in India & how far lesser bowlers will be the answer because they’re slower