• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Ashwin vs Kumble

kyear2

International Coach
There are obviously logical reasons, just maybe beyond someone's understanding.
Very logical reasons.

At the end of the war in 1948, the greatest bowler of all time was rated to be William O'Reilly.

If he or what he did doesn't count, especially in such a batsman friendly era. Then why should the rest of them?

And we certainly can't exclude Bradman, Hammond, Hutton can we?
 

Coronis

International Coach
Very logical reasons.

At the end of the war in 1948, the greatest bowler of all time was rated to be William O'Reilly.

If he or what he did doesn't count, especially in such a batsman friendly era. Then why should the rest of them?

And we certainly can't exclude Bradman, Hammond, Hutton can we?
I thought the end of the war was in 1945? And was he really? I thought it was Barnes.
 

kyear2

International Coach
I thought the end of the war was in 1945? And was he really? I thought it was Barnes.
Ok, everything got back into full swing by '48, test wise at least.

Well it was a two-person conversation, and I don't include the other, so....
 

Fanboy375

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
So Ashwin didn't play the stronger NZ lineup much and still sucks more than Kumble
but Ashwin and Kumble had different results against SA,Aus and Eng.Ashwin is home>away while Kumble away>home.so it could mean decause of different bowling style they perform differently in pace vs spin conditions.It is like Warne vs Murali case where one is good at pace friendly condition while another is not
 

DrWolverine

First Class Debutant
Ashwin
in WI : 19(6 Tests)
in SL : 21(6 Tests)
in Bang : 28(3 Tests)
in Eng : 28(7 Tests)
in NZ : 33(1 Test)
in Aus : 42(11 Tests)
in SA : 49(7 Tests)

Ash has a decent overseas record except in Aus & SA

Kumble averages 30+ in every country except India and Bang/Zim.
In Ban : 16(4 Tests)
In Zim : 29(4 Tests)
In WI : 31(11 Tests)
In SA : 32(12 Tests)
In Aus : 37(10 Tests)
In NZ : 40(3 Tests)
In Eng : 41(10 Tests)
In Pak : 42(6 Tests)
In SL : 45(10 Tests)
 

sayon basak

International Regular
Ashwin
in WI : 19(6 Tests)
in SL : 21(6 Tests)
in Bang : 28(3 Tests)
in Eng : 28(7 Tests)
in NZ : 33(1 Test)
in Aus : 42(11 Tests)
in SA : 49(7 Tests)

Ash has a decent overseas record except in Aus & SA
WI, SL and BD don't matter at all. Averaging 45+ in 18 matches in SA and AUS is too big of a hole to overlook.
And It's not looking like he could rectify it either.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
but Ashwin and Kumble had different results against SA,Aus and Eng.Ashwin is home>away while Kumble away>home.so it could mean decause of different bowling style they perform differently in pace vs spin conditions.It is like Warne vs Murali case where one is good at pace friendly condition while another is not
Kumble at home had to deal with flat pitches in the 2000s.

If you look at his 90s record when pitches were better it is comparable to Ashwin and that too without DRS.

Kumble away overall is just better.

Kumble is just better.
 

Johan

International Debutant
Ashwin
in WI : 19(6 Tests)
in SL : 21(6 Tests)
in Bang : 28(3 Tests)
in Eng : 28(7 Tests)
in NZ : 33(1 Test)
in Aus : 42(11 Tests)
in SA : 49(7 Tests)

Ash has a decent overseas record except in Aus & SA

Kumble averages 30+ in every country except India and Bang/Zim.
In Ban : 16(4 Tests)
In Zim : 29(4 Tests)
In WI : 31(11 Tests)
In SA : 32(12 Tests)
In Aus : 37(10 Tests)
In NZ : 40(3 Tests)
In Eng : 41(10 Tests)
In Pak : 42(6 Tests)
In SL : 45(10 Tests)
Not putting a horse in the race here but I won't really take Ashwin's England average seriously, he was a complete defense bowler here, it was just the WTC final in extreme bowler friendly conditions, both times he came over here to play as a spinner against England he was basically a defensive stock bowler with no impact.
 

subshakerz

Hall of Fame Member
Not putting a horse in the race here but I won't really take Ashwin's England average seriously, he was a complete defense bowler here, it was just the WTC final in extreme bowler friendly conditions, both times he came over here to play as a spinner against England he was basically a defensive stock bowler with no impact.
I've been saying the same thing yet get so much flak. Ashwin in England was a total support bowler.

You are a welcome presence here.
 

Top