• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Archived [10/08/07] Battrick

Status
Not open for further replies.

andyc

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Stamina --> Fitness Net
Conc & Cons --> Fielding Net with respective primary net. If you have a keeper trainee his keeping net and batting net will get his conc up fairly quickly.
FTR, a keeping net and a fielding net improve secondaries (conc and cons) at the same rate. It's just that if you're giving someone keeping nets, you're probably going to be giving them batting nets as well, so his conc will go up faster than his cons.
 

Bobisback

International Regular
Maaan, looking at my PFL just now, Wikus is still on lively. he bowled 16.3 overs in my 5 T20 matches. Insane, cant imagine what its gonna be like when FC comes in. 5 days playing matches and a training day, its gonna hurt.
 

chaminda_00

Hall of Fame Member
Maaan, looking at my PFL just now, Wikus is still on lively. he bowled 16.3 overs in my 5 T20 matches. Insane, cant imagine what its gonna be like when FC comes in. 5 days playing matches and a training day, its gonna hurt.
Might need two sides by the time FC comes around, probably going to buy a bunch of mediocres. Even if players have got good stamina it looks like if they getting trained they wont be able to play both forms regularly.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Personally wouldn't have paid more then 10k for him, his only mediocre and he will age to 18 in a couple weeks. Might you the prices could have increased a lot since i last looked for those players and that could a normal price, considering he should pop soon to competent and has good cons.
Yea, at least he will pop to competent-proficient shortly.

Won another brief BT20 encounter, but the PFLs still take their usual beating.
 

superkingdave

Hall of Fame Member
woo good week poppage wise

Michael Howell - 18 yo, BT Rating=24,561
LH Batsman, LF Bowler, superb batting form, superb bowling form, sublime
An attacking player with proficient leadership skills and woeful experience.
Stamina: competent Wicket Keeping: superb
Batting: strong Concentration: respectable
Bowling: worthless Consistency: feeble
Fielding: respectable

Santosh Islam - 21 yo, BT Rating=81,404
LH Batsman, LFM Bowler, superb batting form, superb bowling form, energetic
A destructive player with mediocre leadership skills and competent experience.
Stamina: competent Wicket Keeping: abysmal
Batting: abysmal Concentration: respectable
Bowling: wonderful Consistency: masterful
Fielding: mediocre

Mark Pearce - 19 yo, BT Rating=19,939
RH Batsman, RM Bowler, superb batting form, superb bowling form, energetic
A defensive player with proficient leadership skills and abysmal experience.
Stamina: competent Wicket Keeping: worthless
Batting: worthless Concentration: woeful
Bowling: quality Consistency: proficient
Fielding: woeful

Luke Sainsbury - 19 yo, BT Rating=15,803
RH Batsman, RM Bowler, superb batting form, superb bowling form, sublime
A defensive player with strong leadership skills and abysmal experience.
Stamina: competent Wicket Keeping: worthless
Batting: proficient Concentration: mediocre
Bowling: strong Consistency: mediocre
Fielding: feeble

Those are the ones i can see
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
'Interesting' start:

End of Over 5: 31-4, runrate=6.20
Sutton 1-0-6-1
Armstrong* 0 (2 balls)
Preece 6 (4 balls)

Last Wicket: Wheat b. Sutton 16 (FOW: 25/4)

Lost a wicket practically every over to a respectable seam strong spin lineup. Recovered to this, not the greatest run rate...


End of Over 16: 122-4, runrate=7.63
Rudland 3-0-29-0
Preece* 45 (37 balls)
Armstrong 50 (35 balls)

Last Wicket: Wheat b. Sutton 16 (FOW: 25/4)
 
Last edited:

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
End of Over 20: 158-4, runrate=7.90
Gretton 4-0-25-1
Preece* 63 (50 balls)
Armstrong 68 (46 balls)

Last Wicket: Wheat b. Sutton 16 (FOW: 25/4)


Pretty poor total, I've got two competents bowling (4 of the last 5 overs from them) but I'm expecting Summers, Pace and Preece to decimate their batting.
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
The BT screwover still going strong.


End of Over 4: 35-1, runrate=8.75, reqrunrate=7.75 (158-4)
Summers 2-0-12-0
Singh* 17 (13 balls)
Saint 10 (6 balls)

Last Wicket: Spiers Run Out 8 (FOW: 15/1)
 

Scaly piscine

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Woohoo, 4 in an over including a hattrick...


End of Over 6: 38-5, runrate=6.33, reqrunrate=8.64 (158-4)
Summers 3-1-12-4
Saint* 11 (7 balls)
Francis 0 (0 balls)

Last Wicket: Soleyn c. Armstrong b. Summers 0 (FOW: 38/5)



Oh and Ladbrokes (they're bowling now) in big trouble:



End of Over 9: 85-2, runrate=9.44, reqrunrate=5.45 (144-10)
Fitzpatrick 1-0-7-0
Cleaver* 54 (34 balls)
Weston 20 (10 balls)

Last Wicket: Lister b. Matthews 4 (FOW: 41/2)

They've got a couple more overs from Matthews to come but the rest is dross apart from the last 3-4 overs.
 
Last edited:

Adamc

Cricketer Of The Year
Geez, can't believe how easy your draw has been. Newcastle Knights look like favourites now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top