Prince EWS
Global Moderator
It's close but I'd have to take Garner.Garner was also an underrated fielder. A more complete cricketer than Imran.
For his far superior batting.
It's close but I'd have to take Garner.Garner was also an underrated fielder. A more complete cricketer than Imran.
You just don't let go of anything do you.Thankfully the umpiring in the Caribbean was always just and scandal-free.
My list only differs by 3 names. Kallis, Pollock and Headley.Did my top 15 at the weekend. Strictly Tests so no Pollock and Headley due to sample size.
Bradman
Tendulkar
Sobers
Hobbs
Richards
Hutton
Lara
Smith
Hammond
Gavaskar
Chappell
Sutcliffe
Border
Waugh
Ponting.
If I'm writing a top fifty greatest cricketers OAT list, Pollock and Headley will definitely feature. But strictly in test cricket, think there needs to be a minimum sample. George is particularly unfortunate there because of the lack of tests WI played&then the War.
Thanks God ICC introduced neutral umpiring . Now I know why Ambrose and Lara have such record against India . Otherwise WI umpire would have made sure that Lara averaged like Sobers and Ambrose like Marshall against India.You just don't let go of anything do you.
I referenced one decision, as mentioned by Marshall himself, on if my memory serves correct, was a caught behind.
With regards to India, your great savior, Imran himself referenced India as the excuse / reason why he wanted neutral umpires because it was difficult to get fair decisions.
But you're always ready apparently.
Yeah with Pollock and Headley it's a sample issue strictly in Tests. Both are unfortunate in that regard and make my top 50 greatest cricketers.My list only differs by 3 names. Kallis, Pollock and Headley.
No Kallis?Did my top 15 at the weekend. Strictly Tests so no Pollock and Headley due to sample size.
Bradman
Tendulkar
Sobers
Hobbs
Richards
Hutton
Lara
Smith
Hammond
Gavaskar
Chappell
Sutcliffe
Border
Waugh
Ponting.
If I'm writing a top fifty greatest cricketers OAT list, Pollock and Headley will definitely feature. But strictly in test cricket, think there needs to be a minimum sample. George is particularly unfortunate there because of the lack of tests WI played&then the War.
Don't think he's as good as Waugh and RickNo Kallis?
I made a throw away comment regarding a single decision. One, that's it.Thanks God ICC introduced neutral umpiring . Now I know why Ambrose and Lara have such record against India . Otherwise WI umpire would have made sure that Lara averaged like Sobers and Ambrose like Marshall against India.
I was jokingI made a throw away comment regarding a single decision. One, that's it.
Walsh > Marshall > Ambrose imoThanks God ICC introduced neutral umpiring . Now I know why Ambrose and Lara have such record against India . Otherwise WI umpire would have made sure that Lara averaged like Sobers and Ambrose like Marshall against India.
Good post thanksIn the Caribbean Richards faced Marshall, Holding, Garner, Croft, Walsh, Patterson, Bishop, Daniel, Sylvester Clarke and Ezra Moseley, amongst others. In first-class matches when one or more of these ten bowlers were in the opposition, he scored 1238 runs at an average of 37 with three centuries. Garner dismissed him five times, nobody else more than twice. Richards did not face Roberts or Ambrose because they were his teammates.
In the English county championship Richards faced all these bowlers apart from Garner, who was now his teammate, and additionally came up against Roberts and Ambrose who were now opponents. His record was 3039 runs @ 46 with nine hundreds. Marshall got him five times and Walsh four.
Combined record 4277 runs @ 43 with twelve hundreds. A third of his dismissals were at the hands of one of the fast bowlers mentioned above.
I find it really hard to find any reason to deviate from the names and the order of this list.Did my top 15 at the weekend. Strictly Tests so no Pollock and Headley due to sample size.
Bradman
Tendulkar
Sobers
Hobbs
Richards
Hutton
Lara
Smith
Hammond
Gavaskar
Chappell
Sutcliffe
Border
Waugh
Ponting.
If I'm writing a top fifty greatest cricketers OAT list, Pollock and Headley will definitely feature. But strictly in test cricket, think there needs to be a minimum sample. George is particularly unfortunate there because of the lack of tests WI played&then the War.
Richards, Bradman and Lara scored too fast for me.I find it really hard to find any reason to deviate from the names and the order of this list.
Pretty good listDid my top 15 at the weekend. Strictly Tests so no Pollock and Headley due to sample size.
Bradman
Tendulkar
Sobers
Hobbs
Richards
Hutton
Lara
Smith
Hammond
Gavaskar
Chappell
Sutcliffe
Border
Waugh
Ponting.
If I'm writing a top fifty greatest cricketers OAT list, Pollock and Headley will definitely feature. But strictly in test cricket, think there needs to be a minimum sample. George is particularly unfortunate there because of the lack of tests WI played&then the War.
Hacks.Richards, Bradman and Lara scored too fast for me.
There is far more to batting than hack and slash. Unfortunate these blokes never learnt that lesson.Hacks.
You realize, that when @PlayerComparisons and you both post lists that are exactly the same, I'll know what you're doing, right?Puppet entrenched.
So do we concur that Don Bradman was the Zac Crawley of his era?There is far more to batting than hack and slash. Unfortunate these blokes never learnt that lesson.