Don't disagree but it was the early movement with new ball that did the damage. If still there and Rabada bowls well anything still possible.Nah, not if SA can make 60 at 7 per over, for the 8th wicket.
Averaged 48.45 (SR 87.89) in 2002 & 53.70 (SR 96.76) in 2001 in the years building up to the 2003 WC. HowSTAT! ODI Cricket - Jonty Rhodes - Performance Analysis by YearSaffers have a sentiment quota too, kept Jonty in the side for years.
Steyn is a tougher one because he clearly can still do the business. Plus the bloke trains his arse off and is just too goddamn wholesome to drop.Possibly exceeding it with Amla and Steyn.....
Now show the 90s.Averaged 48.45 (SR 87.89) in 2002 & 53.70 (SR 96.76) in 2001 in the years building up to the 2003 WC. HowSTAT! ODI Cricket - Jonty Rhodes - Performance Analysis by Year
Still fielding like a demon.
C'mon, guys, get to 200 and it can be defended on this pitch; there is enough for the bowlers.
Pure sentiment.... aren't SA players just so cuddly.Steyn is a tougher one because he clearly can still do the business. Plus the bloke trains his arse off and is just too goddamn wholesome to drop.
You free too look at my link above. Was a brilliant limited overs middle order player in his era. Runs against all opposition at a SR more than good enough. Wish we had a #5 #6 like him now.Now show 1992-2001.
Especially in tests. His average for first class matches excluding tests is 56.28 compared with his test average of 32.85. So his continued selection for South Africa was definitely justified by his domestic performance, but he never came anywhere close to reproducing that on a consistent basis at international level.Been a bit of a minnow basher too.
It disappoints so much how his career has gone because he could have been so much better than he has been.
Although he did have a resurgence towards the end of his test career, averaging mid-40s for the last couple of years.You free too look at my link above. Was a brilliant limited overs middle order player in his era. Runs against all opposition at a SR more than good enough. Wish we had a #5 #6 like him now.
Test batting maybe not so much. Had his flaws.
Don't want to belabour the point but I don't agree. Was a Struggletown era for South Africa's ODI side but in any other era where SA had more bats pushing for spots, he doesn't play the WC in 2003.You free too look at my link above. Was a brilliant limited overs middle order player in his era. Runs against all opposition at a SR more than good enough. Wish we had a #5 #6 like him now.
Lord'sAlthough he did have a resurgence towards the end of his test career, averaging mid-40s for the last couple of years.