MW1304
Cricketer Of The Year
He should be. There is literally nobody else.Thank god you got Burns. If he'd got 50 he'd be a cert for West Indies tour.
He should be. There is literally nobody else.Thank god you got Burns. If he'd got 50 he'd be a cert for West Indies tour.
No it's actually Paine ****ing up the reviewsThis. Lyon is the reason we didn't win that series and cheating umpires. Stokes has had remarkable luck in his life. That innings, not having an official criminal record for attempted murder. It's alarming.
England where not the better team by far lmao? Australia dominated more then half of the first test, a decent amount of the 2nd test, most of the 3rd test bar stokes, all of the 4th test and small sections of the 5th test. 2-2 was completely fair.i think that 2-2 was undeserved because it was way too generous to the aussies tbh, england were the better team by far in that series it's just the aussies had at different points one or two blokes england could simply not dislodge lol
There was a clear intensity drop in the final test too. **** comment thatEngland where not the better team by far lmao? Australia dominated more then half of the first test, a decent amount of the 2nd test, most of the 3rd test bar stokes, all of the 4th test and small sections of the 5th test. 2-2 was completely fair.
the thing with teams is that they're eleven playersEngland where not the better team by far lmao? steve smith and marnus labuschagne dominated more then half of the first test, a decent amount of the 2nd test, most of the 3rd test bar stokes, all of the 4th test and small sections of the 5th test. 2-2 was completely fair.
Ashes 2013 should have been 4-0 to us before the thrashing a few months later.If England wins this to make it 3-1, which would be the more undeserved scoreline - this series or 2019?
well in the Lord's test we had 12 tbfthe thing with teams is that they're eleven players
I'd rather we pick anybody but him. I'd even open with Bairstow before picking him.He should be. There is literally nobody else.
@GIMH asterix on the retention?well in the Lord's test we had 12 tbf
He also single handedly ruined his careerNo it's actually Paine ****ing up the reviews
Come to think of it, Tim single handedly made sure Aust doesn't make the wtc final
And England had more performing players?the thing with teams is that they're eleven players
Damn those concussions.hamstring I think
Looks a real find. With the strength of the front line pacers he is ideal as a 4th quick and you can manage his workload better than we have with Stokes at times. One to persevere with through the inevitable bad times but looks best all-rounder Aussies had in my lifetime by a long way.Green is scarily good. You just expect him to get a wicket when he comes on to bowl.
Not sure about Warne's suggestion to promote Stokes up the order.
whati think that 2-2 was undeserved because it was way too generous to the aussies tbh, england were the better team by far in that series it's just the aussies had at different points one or two blokes england could simply not dislodge lol
Nah come on.I'd rather we pick anybody but him. I'd even open with Bairstow before picking him.
He looked better in that series than Burns and Hameed have in this. ?And England had more performing players?
They were playing Jason Roy ffs