• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

4th Test at the Gabba, Brisbane, 15 - 19 Jan 2021

Spark

Global Moderator
He says, imputing malice to try and gin up a controversy.
Cummins bowled five, count them, five bouncers to Saini. Three of them came relatively close to getting him out caught in the slips cordon. Based on this you claimed that Cummins sole intent -- not part of the plan, but his only intent -- was to injure the batsman.

This makes 0 sense, bluntly. They bowled bouncers in the hope that he would dolly one up in the air or nick off. It's an entirely legitimate wicket-taking strategy and here you were, saying that the intention "wasn't to get him out caught" when virtually every single fielder was in a catching position. Come off it.
 

Gnske

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Cummins bowled five, count them, five bouncers to Saini. Three of them came relatively close to getting him out caught in the slips cordon. Based on this you claimed that Cummins sole intent -- not part of the plan, but his only intent -- was to injure the batsman.

This makes 0 sense, bluntly.
Are you in his brain? Do you know?

Dire posting, take 5 fam.
 

trundler

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Cummins bowled five, count them, five bouncers to Saini. Three of them came relatively close to getting him out caught in the slips cordon. Based on this you claimed that Cummins sole intent -- not part of the plan, but his only intent -- was to injure the batsman.

This makes 0 sense, bluntly. They bowled bouncers in the hope that he would dolly one up in the air or nick off. It's an entirely legitimate wicket-taking strategy and here you were, saying that the intention "wasn't to get him out caught" when virtually every single fielder was in a catching position. Come off it.
Haha, more condescension. The professor hath spoken. Everyone else must be wrong.
 

Top