which will be Smith, Root or Stokes. Can't see anyone else playing a significant single handed innings.2 **** batting lineups
As with the first 3 tests, winner will be the team that has a batter play the most significant innings as I just can’t see it being a group effort
People have been saying that for about 15 years, tbf.Batting worldwide is at its lowest ebb in 30 years.
No way. Until around 2014 people were complaining about how the batsmen dominated the sport. It was particularly bad between 01 and 10.People have been saying that for about 15 years, tbf.
You'd think they would only do that if they could drop Paine and retain Wade, who's a better bat.Seems to be some suggestions that Australia may play 4 seamers + Lyon; dropping Wade from the 12.
I reckon they'd probably play Patto as the fourth seamer as well in that situation. Best bat of the bowlers (not that he's made any runs this series yet, but all the same) which is important if one of them is going to bat seven, and having five bowlers would reduce concerns of him breaking down playing two Tests in a row.You'd think they would only do that if they could drop Paine and retain Wade, who's a better bat.
They were all Pommy backpackers though.When I was in Melbourne and Sydney all I saw was thousands of young drugged up hipsters trying their best to be european
Did he make 40 odd in the first test, or am I imagining that?I reckon they'd probably play Patto as the fourth seamer as well in that situation. Best bat of the bowlers (not that he's made any runs this series yet, but all the same) which is important if one of them is going to bat seven, and having five bowlers would reduce concerns of him breaking down playing two Tests in a row.
That was Siddle with 44Did he make 40 odd in the first test, or am I imagining that?
Patto did too, but it was the second innings in his case (i.e. downhill skiing)That was Siddle with 44