Let it be known, I really hope this was a misunderstanding and Siraj misinterpreted "Shiraz" as racist.https://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricke...buse-of-indian-cricketer-20210110-p56t0q.html
Scenes if stephen's 5D chess theory comes true
mate, I went to record it through the Windows 10 GameBar but it seems like they've removed the ability to record when you're clearly in a web browserBandicam? Good god I haven't seen that watermark in awhile, you're stuck in the stone age mate.
Good content from the both of you though. Lovely.
Isn't that a region north of India where the Nazis believed the matter race evolved from? An unfortunate last name when it comes to allegations of racism though.
Nazis believe 'Aryans' came from the Eurasian Steppe, and that some migrated down to Iran/Northwest India, some migrated West to Europe.Isn't that a region north of India where the Nazis believed the matter race evolved from? An unfortunate last name when it comes to allegations of racism though.
No. European indologists interpretation of Indian history coupled with world wars gave 'aryan' or 'swastika' a bad reputation.Isn't that a region north of India where the Nazis believed the matter race evolved from? An unfortunate last name when it comes to allegations of racism though.
YepHe fell to the off side quite a bit and just nailed those deliveries through midwicket anyway. This became really apparent towards the end of his career when he became... less good at this.
Post of the thread.Nazis believe 'Aryans' came from the Eurasian Steppe, and that some migrated down to Iran/Northwest India, some migrated West to Europe.
I happen to be originally from NW India and look very atypical for an Indian. I find his last name utterly embarrassing, and would change it if it were mine.
Ive always thought they were hard done by tbhgave 'aryan' or 'swastika' a bad reputation.
totally harmless, you'll find those symbols in South American and Japanese historical places too.Ive always thought they were hard done by tbh
Right, what I was thinking was more that the shots that Smith really relies on hand eye for are the wide flashy drives whereas Ponting relied on it to play balls on the stumps. Smith obviously could just elect not to play those shots or change how he plays them, whereas Ponting never could/did. In general imo the bigger your backlift, the more reliant on hand eye you are because the earlier you have to decide where the ball will be.Yep
Was about to post same thing
Ponting was a modern day Viv
You couldn’t teach a non genius to be consistent with that technique
Smith, for all his idiosyncrasies, play much straighter
I dont think they are that similar as players and I guess I will put Smith in the category above Ponting amongst the best batsmen I have seen but I do feel his batting career will follow a similar trajectory.Right, what I was thinking was more that the shots that Smith really relies on hand eye for are the wide flashy drives whereas Ponting relied on it to play balls on the stumps. Smith obviously could just elect not to play those shots or change how he plays them, whereas Ponting never could/did. In general imo the bigger your backlift, the more reliant on hand eye you are because the earlier you have to decide where the ball will be.
I don't think Smith will play on as Ponting did tbh. Ponting really probably should have retired when he gave up the captaincy and his career would look a lot more impressive if he had, lacking that two or three years more of mediocrity tacked on to the end.I dont think they are that similar as players and I guess I will put Smith in the category above Ponting amongst the best batsmen I have seen but I do feel his batting career will follow a similar trajectory.