Lol if Australia lose this they didn’t lose it by bowling eight bad overs today ffs. They’ll have lost it by not finding a way to make 300 plus in their second dig.If Australia lose this, that 2nd new ball bowling will be up there with Devon Malcolm in 5th Test in SA in 95/96 as the worst match-defining new ball bowl balling in memory.
Just startling how much Hazelwood & especially Pattinson lost the plot considering how well Oz have bowled in this series until then.
Cummins & Lyon pulled it back a bit but if England get the target down to under 100 without another wicket, they're favourites.
I mean it didn't help. Obviously not having an extra 50 runs on the board cut the margin of error but had they bowled as well as they did they'd have conceded 30 runs less and probably taken another wicket.Lol if Australia lose this they didn’t lose it by bowling eight bad overs today ffs. They’ll have lost it by not finding a way to make 300 plus in their second dig.
Failing to defend 360 against this batting line-up with this attack would be criminalLol if Australia lose this they didn’t lose it by bowling eight bad overs today ffs. They’ll have lost it by not finding a way to make 300 plus in their second dig.
Your Woakes Your Stokes Your Foakesmitchell 'gary ayres' starc on the microphone here, "your buttlers and your...woakes"
look, I don't think Paine is getting sacked no matter how bad the loss isNeed to look at the bigger picture - England chasing this down is good for the game .................
Well, maybe. One could say it’d be ridiculous to even consider dropping him.And with Smith we make 500