Prince EWS
Global Moderator
Yeah there's a bit of a difference between picking someone off limited evidence and picking someone despite substantial evidence telling you it won't end well. The Roy pick has muuuch more in common with the Finch one than the Warner one.I've said this before and will no doubt say it again, but Warner was averaging over fifty in first class cricket when he was picked for tests. Admittedly that wasn't from too many matches, some of which were against a Zimbabwe XI, but it's more than the likes of Finch and Roy have ever done.
It was worth a punt given they'd exhausted all the conventional options, and now that they've done it I'd persist a little longer (although I'd consider swapping him and Denly in the batting order), but there isn't the precedent in Warner people think there is.
Last edited: