• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

2nd Test, Lord's, London

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
I've said this before and will no doubt say it again, but Warner was averaging over fifty in first class cricket when he was picked for tests. Admittedly that wasn't from too many matches, some of which were against a Zimbabwe XI, but it's more than the likes of Finch and Roy have ever done.
Yeah there's a bit of a difference between picking someone off limited evidence and picking someone despite substantial evidence telling you it won't end well. The Roy pick has muuuch more in common with the Finch one than the Warner one.

It was worth a punt given they'd exhausted all the conventional options, and now that they've done it I'd persist a little longer (although I'd consider swapping him and Denly in the batting order), but there isn't the precedent in Warner people think there is.
 
Last edited:

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I think I've only seen one person ever suggest it (Leach) seriously. It gets tossed around as a joke/troll sometimes.

Woakes opening is a live option though. I wouldn't go there because it'd mean Curran would come in and I think five seamers in a Test should be punishable by death, but just from a "best opening options" angle it's not that crazy at all.
The other problem is that I think it could **** with his bowling hard. I'd consider it in English conditions but away from home I think you'd want a proper option. Who that is, I don't know.
 

Uppercut

Request Your Custom Title Now!
As someone who has sometimes played the role of toporderwatchman in club cricket I'm not totally against the idea for England. I do think it hurts their chances of building a properly serious test side in the long term though. And the added value of having the 5th seam bowling option if you squeeze Curran in or whatever is just so low.
Depends what the alternative is though. If doing it means getting Denly out of the team then it's probably a positive in terms of building a team long-term.
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
So with a whole day lost to rain, with 98 overs to bowl today, and Australia bowls 12 overs in first hour
98 overs a day ain't happening consistently in test matches, especially as the last session is always very slow. The only way would be if each pace bowler cut five paces off their runs, the batsmen stopped futzing around and field adjustments were made in an apparently impossibly timely manner.
 

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Burns seems to have two scoring areas, off his pads between mid on and square leg, and 180° in the other direction between slips and point.

Ooh, that was close.
 

Top