• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

2nd greatest living cricketer

Who is the 2nd greatest living cricketer (behind Sobers)?


  • Total voters
    74

Coronis

International Coach
How can you be the greatest cricketer of any form of you weren’t the best at some point in one of the major disciplines
Because he was a top 5 batsman for a decade plus, as well as a very useful bowler and excellent fielder.

Kallis doesn't make ATXI of either Test or ODI(most people). Yet he is the greatest cricketer ?
Second greatest and living being the two caveats you forgot to mention. And who is the person preventing him from taking a spot in Test XI’s? Sobers.
 

Teja.

Global Moderator
2. Imran Khan (batting is moderately overrated, bowling is moderately underrated but still easy decision)
3. Richard Hadlee (The best living fast bowler ever while also being a decent lower order batsman)
4. Jacques Kallis (I don't consider him to be in the top 10 batsmen of all time nor do I consider him anywhere as good an overall all rounder as Sobers due to his low wpm and lack of significant simultaneous success but overall, you gotta respect the value)
5. Shane Warne (basically as good as Murali v. top 8 nations, can actually hold a bat, great slip fielder. Also, people don't really understand the flexibility and balance that an ATG leg spinner can give to a bowling attack. Turned matches on a dime, haterz can suck it)
6. Muttaih Muralitharan (the best specialist bowler)
7. Sachin Tendulkar (only living batsman with similar longevity and quality of output is Sobers IMO). Generally, bowlers add more value to a XI per match but Sachin played for 23 years.
8. Sunil Gavaskar (better than any other living opener by an unhealthy amount)
9. Glenn McGrath - regularly traumatised World Class No.3s and No.4s. The stronger the opposite batting line up, the more useful McGrath was. The best bowler against the top order ever.
10. Brian Lara - definition of the clutch batsman. Scored something like 25% of his runs against McGrath and Warne which is absolutely ****ing absurd.

Honourable Mention to Viv Richards.
 
Last edited:

smash84

The Tiger King
Has to be Imran (thinking of greatness in terms of not being limited to playing the game).

It's easy to forget that after his cricketing career was over he went into philanthropy and still has the Imran Khan foundation which has done some phenomenal work. Over the years it has built some really world class hospitals in Pakistan and worked tirelessly to raise funds for them, and these hospitals treat the poor free. He also built a university where 90% of students (because they come from impoverished backgrounds) study free.
 

smash84

The Tiger King
2. Imran Khan
3. Richard Hadlee
4. Jacques Kallis (I don't consider him to be in the top 10 batsmen of all time nor do I consider him anywhere as good an overall all rounder as Sobers due to his low wpm but overall, you gotta respect the value)
5. Malcolm Marshall (he is at least as good a bowler as Murali while being quite handy with the bat, averaged 19 including multiple clutch innings)
Maco passed away last century buddy
 

Nintendo

Cricketer Of The Year
I know he didn't play much test but has to be proctor right? Guy was as good a bowler as hadlee and a far better batsmen from what i've heard.
 

Slifer

International Captain
Here's a logical question, assuming the South Africans from the 70s and 80s were allowed to play. How would we rate them assuming they only played the European based teams : NZ, ENG, AUS??
 

ankitj

Hall of Fame Member
Has to be Imran (thinking of greatness in terms of not being limited to playing the game).

It's easy to forget that after his cricketing career was over he went into philanthropy and still has the Imran Khan foundation which has done some phenomenal work. Over the years it has built some really world class hospitals in Pakistan and worked tirelessly to raise funds for them, and these hospitals treat the poor free. He also built a university where 90% of students (because they come from impoverished backgrounds) study free.
How does the fact that Imran thinks women's clothes are responsible for rapes affect his rating as a cricketer?
 

Pap Finn Keighl

International Debutant
I know he didn't play much test but has to be proctor right? Guy was as good a bowler as hadlee and a far better batsmen from what i've heard.
Its Proctor. The best after Big 3 ( Sobers, Don, WG)

Procter played 16 "tests" in a span of 13 years.

1966 - 67
SA vs Australia
3 matches, 15wkts at 17.5 avg

1969-70
SA vs Australia
4 matches, 209 runs @ 34.8 avg
26 wkts @ 13.5 avg

1970
ROW vs England
5 matches, 292 runs @ 48.6
15 wkts @ 23.9

1978 - 79
World 11 ( 3 matches against Australia, 1 vs WI)
4 matches, 182 runs @ 30.3 avg
14 wkts @ 16 avg
 

smash84

The Tiger King
How does the fact that Imran thinks women's clothes are responsible for rapes affect his rating as a cricketer?
I don't know about that. He denied that he ever said that when CNN put that question to him.

However, what certainly marks him down is his backing of Mohammad Sami as the next potential coming of Malcolm Marshall :p
 

Top