Another very dubious decision IMOLooks like Maddinson is going through one of those really crap stretches he sometimes has again
EDIT: Oh dear Smith. Only two types of leave, and that one was definitely of the second variety
Yeah, as much as it can always tend to loook worse when someone gets struck playing no shot, that one definitely looked a bit high, even more so on replayAnother very dubious decision IMO
It definitely wasn't high, you can see that from the side-on. Question is whether it came back enough. 50-50 for me. Either way you don't leave those onesYeah, as much as it can always tend to loook worse when someone gets struck playing no shot, that one definitely looked a bit high, even more so on replay
Anyone else get mildly annoyed at the talk about 'a spell of inswingers from Boland'? He doesnt swing the, he moves it off the pitch (which is arguably harder to deal with'. I'm guessing it's just me.
I would have thought so too. However, Cartwright is now batting again on 65* after retiring on 52He definitely shouldn't get to be not out for that. That's retired out.
Came up against a stronger side. Tbh Victoria should probably be their own Test side separate from the rest of AusWow, NSW with 3 Test stars and 3 Aus A players may get beaten by 250+ runs
It's still happening now. If a batter got injured on the current Tour, they could field a batting unit with 4 keepers (Pope, Duckett, Smith, Cox).Was it England like a decade ago that had every single promising young batsman be a keeper one way or another? It's not ideal tbh.