wpdavid
Hall of Fame Member
That explains it then. In that case, I definitely don't blame them for heading home ASAP.I think they did to be fair.
That explains it then. In that case, I definitely don't blame them for heading home ASAP.I think they did to be fair.
Short term replacement for Jamieson, I believe.Turns out that Ashwin is only playing this one game for Surrey. Honestly, what on earth was the point?
Looks like it. Worcester having a poor season tooWhen did Middlesex become the worst county? Bottom of Championship and t20 groups. Thrashed by a Kent team with 7 debutants because of players missing with covid.
Kellow?Somerset lost against Cornwall with the nephew of THE Exeter City legend playing a part.
Indeed.Kellow?
Not for Surrey. Off the top of my head, Roy, Jacks, SCurran and TCurran are likely to play in the Hundred. I'd be surprised if Burns has been signed up, and Foakes is still injured.Some teams suffer than others. Surrey and Essex are hammered by the hundred. 12-apiece I believe.
Even Dom Sibley has a Hundred contract, with the Birmingham franchise,Not for Surrey. Off the top of my head, Roy, Jacks, SCurran and TCurran are likely to play in the Hundred. I'd be surprised if Burns has been signed up, and Foakes is still injured.
EDIT
Consider me surprised. Burns has been signed up by the Oval Invincibles, as have Clark, Evans and Topley.
Not something I expected to see. I suppose they'll both be batting somewhere down the order in these games.Even Dom Sibley has a Hundred contract, with the Birmingham franchise,
Is it a powerplay thing? I guess Surrey would have had their first 9 overs of the powerplay before the rain, but Notts get it pro-rata down to 6?Ridiculous goings-on at Guildford, which I was lucky enough to be able to watch on the live stream. Surrey 29 for 1 when the rain came after 8 overs, with Amla gone and not the most promising line-up to come. When I switched on, Ryan Patel was struggling to lay bat on ball against Matt Montgomery's gentle off-spin, and I'd have taken 150 gladly. Scrap that, Patel, whose previous highest List A score was 43, got his eye in and hit the same bowler for three consecutive sixes. Then did the same to Joey Evison and astonished everyone with an innings of 131 off 70 deliveries. Cue Jamie Smith and 50 from 16 deliveries before perishing for 54. They ended up with 311 from 30 overs. And that's before D/L comes into play as it didn't become a 30 over game until the 9th over.
EDIT
Interestingly, the Notts target was reduced to 300 from 30 overs. Not sure I understand the logic, but whatever. Notts started like a train at 72-0 from their first five and a half overs, so this may be quite a contest.
That makes sense.Is it a powerplay thing? I guess Surrey would have had their first 9 overs of the powerplay before the rain, but Notts get it pro-rata down to 6?