• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

2015 Final Test Rankings - Steve Smith #1, Williamson #2, Voges #11

burr

State Vice-Captain
I know I'm very late to the party on this but I just saw on The Verdict that Williamson only has an average of 49ish. I'm very surprised given he's scored 13 hundreds and seems so talented. Did he take a while to get going in test cricket (ala Steve Waugh)? I'm sure someone can be kind and explain without me having to trawl through 24 pages of this thread. Thanks :)
 

hendrix

Hall of Fame Member
I know I'm very late to the party on this but I just saw on The Verdict that Williamson only has an average of 49ish. I'm very surprised given he's scored 13 hundreds and seems so talented. Did he take a while to get going in test cricket (ala Steve Waugh)? I'm sure someone can be kind and explain without me having to trawl through 24 pages of this thread. Thanks :)
Picked very young, had to take a lot of the batting responsibility in a weak batting lineup, and struggled with it initially. Also was thrust into the deep end at number 3 relatively early on. The (relatively few) weaknesses he had as a young batsman were magnified by these factors.

I wouldn't say he took a while to get going because he still scored centuries occasionally (including on debut), and he certainly looked the goods - was never at risk of being dropped or anything. Just the natural teething process for a young batsman was exposed. I don't know whether he's better for it now or if he would've matured anyway. I'm inclined to say the latter.
 
Last edited:

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Yeah, it's a bit different to Waugh because Waugh wasn't really justifying his spot as a batsman; he was holding his place based on potential and the value his bowling added. Williamson wasn't killing it but he was still contributing and clearly better than the alternatives; I don't think anyone suggested dropping him. It was just a case of him being young and not world class yet.

If you split his career so far into two, he averaged 33 for the first half and has averaged 68 for the second half.
 

Flem274*

123/5
before his third test ton in Sri Lanka (which imo kicked him off as a consistent batsman in test cricket) he was averaging less than 30.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Didn't Martin Crowe have a very similar beginning to his career as welll? Pretty sure I have heard him state on interviews that he wished he was not picked that young and that it kinda messed up his stats a bit.
 

kiwiviktor81

International Debutant
It's a Kiwi thing. Vettori had it as well. Basically we don't have a lot of depth so if you're talented enough we'll put you in the side at 18 or 19.

Contrast this with Mike Hussey. If Mike Hussey had been a Kiwi he probably would have made the team at age 17, or about 10 years earlier than he debuted for Australia.

Crowe averages about 50 if you take out his early years, which is probably a better reflection of how good he actually was.

Guys that good are wasted in our domestic set-up so we put them in the team early. In a way I think it actually helps us as we can make a mediocre player fairly good by giving him enough international experience.
 

91Jmay

International Coach
Root's hundred yesterday was the best he has played I think. His winter has confirmed he is a world class batsmen, as there were some justifiable questions about him scoring runs overseas.
 

flibbertyjibber

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Root up to 2 today then. Not a lot between him Smith and Williamson just 10 ranking points so they may all get a go as number 1 in the coming weeks with the NZ v Aus series coming up.
 

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
Is it going to be Root's thing to play amazing knocks and get to #1 and then flop the next game or two and go back to the line?
 

mr_mister

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
so is Kohli the clear number 4 now for some reason? It seems that Smith, KW and Root are being talked about way more often nowadays by this forum
 

Top