• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

2015 Final Test Rankings - Steve Smith #1, Williamson #2, Voges #11

Victor Ian

International Coach
How so? I'm not disputing you, because the above was only my own conception based on nothing much really, but in the age before these flat wickets started to prevail Australia produced players that dominated the whole world, both here and on tracks the world over.
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah but the drop ins are considered one reason why the pitches are flat, slow and dead rather than flat, fast and bouncy.

iirc the Adelaide pitch is a bit if an exception as the left the grass a lot longer than any normal Test pitch would
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
Yeah I get that but it shows that you can make a good test wicket from a drop-in. Clearly drop-ins aren't ideal but you can make it more bowler friendly - its not impossible
 

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Yeah but they don't want it more bowler-friendly in that way. 3-day tests don't help the broadcasters.
 

Adders

Cricketer Of The Year
this is where you're wrong. The wickets could be far bouncier and have a lot more pace, would help them a hell of a lot more than the slow dead **** they've been dishing up
Depending on who they are playing. Sub continent teams yes......England, NZ and South Africa No.

I know you wont accept it (and that's fair enough......your opinion V's mine) but that is where they ****ed up with the 2010 MCG wicket. It was produced to give your bowlers the edge, but it handed the test to Englands bowlers when we won the toss. As much as I like to LOL at how that test played out, I totally accept if Australia had bowled first and bowled well (which is very debatable if they would have) then the test could have played out very differently.
 
Last edited:

TheJediBrah

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Depending on who they are playing. Sub continent teams yes......England, NZ and South Africa No.

I know you wont accept it (and that's fair enough......your opinion V's mine) but that is where they ****ed up with the 2010 MCG wicket. It was produced to give your bowlers the edge, but it handed the test to Englands bowlers when we won the toss. As much as I like to LOL at how that test played out, I totally accept if Australia had bowled first and bowled well (which is very debatable if they would have) then the test could have played out very differently.
I don't really know much about the 2010 MCG test tbh. But things were a lot different back then. If they did go out of their way to "doctor" a wicket to help then that's something they should do more now, regardless of how it turned out.

Pretty sure I've said this a few times, but this whole pitch discussion is generally based around the last few years, not really 5+ years ago where the wickets were all very different. But I appreciate your contribution nonetheless.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
MCG wasn't really the wicket, was it? It was a slightly greenish version of a normal MCG pitch, it was really the overhead conditions + Anderson more than anything else.

Certainly it didn't look particularly hard for batting by the afternoon...
 

Adders

Cricketer Of The Year
MCG wasn't really the wicket, was it? It was a slightly greenish version of a normal MCG pitch, it was really the overhead conditions + Anderson more than anything else.

Certainly it didn't look particularly hard for batting by the afternoon...
Nah it was green....very green on that first morning. That combined with overcast conditions set up the carnage that followed, and pretty much as soon as England came out to bat the sun came out and the wicket flattened right out.

But seriously, what happened in Perth was 100% an influence on the wicket that was served up in Melbourne.

Edit:

This was the morning of the test.

mcg_2010.jpg
 
Last edited:

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
It took Saker to convince them to bowl first, it was hardly the wicket that's being made out.

I thought it was greener in Sydney the next game when Clarke won the toss and batted.
 

91Jmay

International Coach
Wonder how much Stokes will move up after this test? Surely going to be one of the biggest shifts ever.
 

Top