• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

1st Match - Pakistan v New Zealand

Italianoo

Cricket Spectator
True, missing Boult and Ferguson leaves a big gap, especially in nailing those yorkers at the death. It's a key skill for New Zealand in tight games.
 

James

Cricket Web Owner
It also shows how poor the cricket commentators are, they made it seem like Pakistan were a million miles off it
and I think Pakistan thought that themselves as well haven't they. As Simon Doull on commentary was saying, I think Fakhar not being able to open rattled them and they failed to come up with a Plan B.
 

King Kane

International Vice-Captain
One definite gap in the absence of Boult/Ferguson is someone who can land yorkers in at the death.
Even Southee could bowl some yorkers at the death in between bowling slot balls that got smashed for six, Boult was the best at it, great death bowler.
 

NZTailender

I can't believe I ate the whole thing
Mate are you trolling?
Unlike the other thread, no.

The problem wasn't the guy scoring 64 (90), it was the guys 6 (19), 3 (14) and 24 (41). One of those three (the Latham) to Babar's Young would've seen them sitting pretty right now. Edit: though this is harsh on Fakhar and his injury.

Absolute garbage to blame this squarely on Babar when 3 to 4 other batsmen - plus the bowlers - didn't step up.

Also ignores how well NZ have played but w/e
 

NZTailender

I can't believe I ate the whole thing
To be fair to Babar, Fakhar was supposed to be the aggressor but his innings ended up stalling the chase instead (not for lack of trying I know). Dotting up at both ends is fatal.
Indeed. Pakistan didn't have much of a plan outside of "and then Babar and Fakhar will just blitz it for us"
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
To be fair to Babar, Fakhar was supposed to be the aggressor but his innings ended up stalling the chase instead (not for lack of trying I know). Dotting up at both ends is fatal.
Also a fair few runs were missed because Fakhar couldn't run that well, there was a 6 ball period where 3 runs where left out there because of Fakhar's injury
 

govinda indian fan

State Captain
Unlike the other thread, no.

The problem wasn't the guy scoring 64 (90), it was the guys 6 (19), 3 (14) and 24 (41). One of those three (the Latham) to Babar's Young would've seen them sitting pretty right now.

Absolute garbage to blame this squarely on Babar when 3 to 4 other batsmen - plus the bowlers - didn't step up.

Also ignores how well NZ have played but w/e
But you are also ignoring the fact that fakhar wicket was purely because babar chewing up deliverys. Babar is great loi batter but is sure slow starter
 

King Kane

International Vice-Captain
O'Rourke getting smashed by Rauf for six bowling too short but backed that up that with a great yorker, he is capable of it, should bowl it more often.
 

Silver Silva

International Vice-Captain
Unlike the other thread, no.

The problem wasn't the guy scoring 64 (90), it was the guys 6 (19), 3 (14) and 24 (41). One of those three (the Latham) to Babar's Young would've seen them sitting pretty right now. Edit: though this is harsh on Fakhar and his injury.

Absolute garbage to blame this squarely on Babar when 3 to 4 other batsmen - plus the bowlers - didn't step up.

Also ignores how well NZ have played but w/e
What about the argument that Pak only scored easily when NZ dropped intensity when game was clearly won?
 

King Kane

International Vice-Captain
The Pakistan tailenders have at least provided some entertainment for the Pakistan supporters that have stuck around, there aren't many of them.
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
Blaming Fakhar getting out on Babar :laugh:

Fakhar was batting slower than Babar ffs. Babar had a SR of 70 and had 35 runs when Fakhar got out, and was going at a run a ball during the partnership. He slowed down again after Babar got out.
 

Top