and I think Pakistan thought that themselves as well haven't they. As Simon Doull on commentary was saying, I think Fakhar not being able to open rattled them and they failed to come up with a Plan B.It also shows how poor the cricket commentators are, they made it seem like Pakistan were a million miles off it
Even Southee could bowl some yorkers at the death in between bowling slot balls that got smashed for six, Boult was the best at it, great death bowler.One definite gap in the absence of Boult/Ferguson is someone who can land yorkers in at the death.
Unlike the other thread, no.Mate are you trolling?
Indeed. Pakistan didn't have much of a plan outside of "and then Babar and Fakhar will just blitz it for us"To be fair to Babar, Fakhar was supposed to be the aggressor but his innings ended up stalling the chase instead (not for lack of trying I know). Dotting up at both ends is fatal.
Also a fair few runs were missed because Fakhar couldn't run that well, there was a 6 ball period where 3 runs where left out there because of Fakhar's injuryTo be fair to Babar, Fakhar was supposed to be the aggressor but his innings ended up stalling the chase instead (not for lack of trying I know). Dotting up at both ends is fatal.
But you are also ignoring the fact that fakhar wicket was purely because babar chewing up deliverys. Babar is great loi batter but is sure slow starterUnlike the other thread, no.
The problem wasn't the guy scoring 64 (90), it was the guys 6 (19), 3 (14) and 24 (41). One of those three (the Latham) to Babar's Young would've seen them sitting pretty right now.
Absolute garbage to blame this squarely on Babar when 3 to 4 other batsmen - plus the bowlers - didn't step up.
Also ignores how well NZ have played but w/e
What about the argument that Pak only scored easily when NZ dropped intensity when game was clearly won?Unlike the other thread, no.
The problem wasn't the guy scoring 64 (90), it was the guys 6 (19), 3 (14) and 24 (41). One of those three (the Latham) to Babar's Young would've seen them sitting pretty right now. Edit: though this is harsh on Fakhar and his injury.
Absolute garbage to blame this squarely on Babar when 3 to 4 other batsmen - plus the bowlers - didn't step up.
Also ignores how well NZ have played but w/e
It's not a bad plan tbfIndeed. Pakistan didn't have much of a plan outside of "and then Babar and Fakhar will just blitz it for us"
It takes on my nerve every time i remember that performanceThat Indian performance in the final takes the cake, 30 overs without a boundary or something ? In a tournament India dominated
NRR means that at no point do we want any of these runs to be leaked. Ball is soft and they're able to risk shotsWhat about the argument that Pak only scored easily when NZ dropped intensity when game was clearly won?
This also ignores Fakhars injury. He's able to run, there's more flow to their partnership, less pressure on either of them.But you are also ignoring the fact that fakhar wicket was purely because babar chewing up deliverys. Babar is great loi batter but is sure slow starter