Pinkline Jones
Banned
Geez Richard I hope your out of sorts correct spelling meltdown doesn't last too long. You are one heck of a guru-like influence on here you do realise.
Last edited:
I'm sure James and co. are grateful that you'll let them make a decision.Richard said:If they want to do it somewhere they can do it elsewhere than our Cricket Chat as far as I'm concerned.
I'll let James and co. make their minds up, but if I was in charge I wouldn't allow it.
At nearly 12,000 posts I think it may be you who needs a life mate.Richard said:You seriously need to get real.
Or better still, get yourself banned like your fool of a mate.
Mate tune into 2GB any morning of the week and you'll realise that AJ and I are radio kings, with talent well beyond what Coleman could even contemplate.superkingdave said:I still wainting for the evidence that suggests Hadley is fit to polish Coleman's boots.
And of course I mentioned anyone "needing to get a life", didn't I?Ray Hadley said:At nearly 12,000 posts I think it may be you who needs a life mate.
Err... who'd that be, then?Belford said:A bloke who spells permanent as "permanint" questioning my fitness to grace an internet forum. Delicious.
Jesus, I never thought I'd see the day when people's post-counts were being attempted to be used against them.And a bloke who has made nearly 12000 posts to an internet site claiming moral authority to assess any human's fitness to do anything, apart from order a pizza and watch the late night foreign movies in the hope of catching a glimpse of nudity - priceless.
There are ways to fool even the cleverest of moderators.BoyBrumby said:Their writing styles are fairly similar (but then so are Chuck Bukowski's & James Ellroy's), which made me smell a rat, but the mods'd be all over 'em if it was the same user(s) so what the hey?!
It's very satisfying to sit on this side of the world and **** you off to this extent.Richard said:There are ways to fool even the cleverest of moderators.
Not everyone has access to just 1 computer, you know.
I even hear IP addresses can be fiddled-around with.
It's only the unwary who try to use the same computer for multiple accounts - it's not impossible that trouble-makers like these (or this one) haven't worked-out ways around the basic identification means.
Well - it's not OOTQ if I've battered Camel56 like I have - but I wasn't really thinking specifically to have a go at me, no, more to make the sort of trouble you guys like making. See, for instance, the 3 posts above LHC's.Belford said:Wake up to yourself, Richard. Do you sincerely believe that anyone would go to the trouble of circumventing multiple-account-security procedures and inventing 4 different personas just to have a crack at you?
No, I'm just not going to bother answering at all, because James has suggested it's better that I don't.Camel56 said:Good question Jonesy but you're plain uphill gardening if you think he is going to answer with any form of sense. Not that he has time, he made over 100 posts in the last 8 hours you know.
Tim, please don't use formatting to get around the language filter. Thanks.LongHopCassidy said:At least he posts his opinion on cricket, and doesn't join forums just to stir up shit.