• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Five Stumps Only Way to Go

Status
Not open for further replies.
Geez Richard I hope your out of sorts correct spelling meltdown doesn't last too long. You are one heck of a guru-like influence on here you do realise.
 
Last edited:

Ray Hadley

Cricket Spectator
Richard said:
If they want to do it somewhere they can do it elsewhere than our Cricket Chat as far as I'm concerned.
I'll let James and co. make their minds up, but if I was in charge I wouldn't allow it.
I'm sure James and co. are grateful that you'll let them make a decision.
 

Ray Hadley

Cricket Spectator
Richard said:
You seriously need to get real. 8-)
Or better still, get yourself banned like your fool of a mate.
At nearly 12,000 posts I think it may be you who needs a life mate.
:wacko:
 

Ray Hadley

Cricket Spectator
superkingdave said:
I still wainting for the evidence that suggests Hadley is fit to polish Coleman's boots.
Mate tune into 2GB any morning of the week and you'll realise that AJ and I are radio kings, with talent well beyond what Coleman could even contemplate.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Belford said:
A bloke who spells permanent as "permanint" questioning my fitness to grace an internet forum. Delicious.
Err... who'd that be, then?
Given that I spelled it with the a and the i the other way around, maybe you need your eyes testing?
Or maybe there's something wrong with your screen - hopefully it might blow-up sometime soon.
And a bloke who has made nearly 12000 posts to an internet site claiming moral authority to assess any human's fitness to do anything, apart from order a pizza and watch the late night foreign movies in the hope of catching a glimpse of nudity - priceless.
Jesus, I never thought I'd see the day when people's post-counts were being attempted to be used against them.
Just shows what straws need to be clutched at, really.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
BoyBrumby said:
Their writing styles are fairly similar (but then so are Chuck Bukowski's & James Ellroy's), which made me smell a rat, but the mods'd be all over 'em if it was the same user(s) so what the hey?!
There are ways to fool even the cleverest of moderators.
Not everyone has access to just 1 computer, you know.
I even hear IP addresses can be fiddled-around with.
It's only the unwary who try to use the same computer for multiple accounts - it's not impossible that trouble-makers like these (or this one) haven't worked-out ways around the basic identification means.
 

Ray Hadley

Cricket Spectator
Richard said:
There are ways to fool even the cleverest of moderators.
Not everyone has access to just 1 computer, you know.
I even hear IP addresses can be fiddled-around with.
It's only the unwary who try to use the same computer for multiple accounts - it's not impossible that trouble-makers like these (or this one) haven't worked-out ways around the basic identification means.
It's very satisfying to sit on this side of the world and **** you off to this extent. :p
 
Richard,

Come on mate - you're amongst friends here. Tell us the real story behind your downward spiral - you know - the old singles date gone horribly wrong. Which party gnawed off his/her own arms in the morning first? And at what point did your stimulating conversational powers see "Jemima" (complete with easy to install instructions) lose interest and have her only hanging on every second word of your non-deceptive interminable bowel-filling babble?
 
Last edited:

Camel56

Banned
Good question Jonesy but you're plain uphill gardening if you think he is going to answer with any form of sense. Not that he has time, he made over 100 posts in the last 8 hours you know.
 

Belford

Banned
Wake up to yourself

Wake up to yourself, Richard. Do you sincerely believe that anyone would go to the trouble of circumventing multiple-account-security procedures and inventing 4 different personas just to have a crack at you? You are a 12000 post, bad spelling, not-too-knowledgeable hermit of a cricket buff, not Fidel Castro.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Belford said:
Wake up to yourself, Richard. Do you sincerely believe that anyone would go to the trouble of circumventing multiple-account-security procedures and inventing 4 different personas just to have a crack at you?
Well - it's not OOTQ if I've battered Camel56 like I have - but I wasn't really thinking specifically to have a go at me, no, more to make the sort of trouble you guys like making. See, for instance, the 3 posts above LHC's.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Camel56 said:
Good question Jonesy but you're plain uphill gardening if you think he is going to answer with any form of sense. Not that he has time, he made over 100 posts in the last 8 hours you know.
No, I'm just not going to bother answering at all, because James has suggested it's better that I don't.
And I, unlike certain fools around here, don't court insubordination.
 

Neil Pickup

Request Your Custom Title Now!
LongHopCassidy said:
At least he posts his opinion on cricket, and doesn't join forums just to stir up shit.
Tim, please don't use formatting to get around the language filter. Thanks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top