Travis_Teh
International Regular
Always picking out the small-print, aren't you ?NZTailender said:My point exactly.
Always picking out the small-print, aren't you ?NZTailender said:My point exactly.
Travis_Teh said:Always picking out the small-pri
After a brief check, there should be a way to give every team 15 or 16 players at the moment without us having to lose a single one of ours. If we get another player signing in, maybe, but we've always had some teams with one or two more players than the other sides.Vimes said:Sorry to spoil the party, but yes, there is - you've got many more players, so you can't hold on to everyone without there being squad unfairness somewhere.
burkey_1988 said:If we have to be a colour:
Gold > Orange
But if they're not a colour, why do the rest of us have to be?Travis_Teh said:Though, I suppose you don't -have- to be named a colour, I doubt that is in the rules anywhere
marc71178 said:But if they're not a colour, why do the rest of us have to be?
We didn't choose your names. Talk to the CWBCC about that!marc71178 said:But if they're not a colour, why do the rest of us have to be?
This comes as no surprise to me, looking at the mercurial nature of people. I'd say a new squad would indeed have more activity simply because it's new to them. No?Loony BoB said:I In three seasons we've managed to out-do every one of the older squads in activity
Pretty much off-topic.Mister Wright said:I would be encouraging all players to stick with the Colts. We are a ligitimate team in the competition. Originally the Colts started because of the influx of new players. At the beginning of our first season except for Daniel and I all players in the squad were rookies. I feel now we have built a successful culture and good team comradery (sp) and I would hate to see that change. Besides, we are not the team that gets all the new rookies, they are spread amongst the teams.
As far as a team name change goes I was originally for a name change to Gold so we weren't seen as a development squad, however, now that we've been playing under that name for a few seasons I would be loath to change it, however I am not the future of this team, so if other members of the team would like to change the name I will give it my full support.
Doesn't mean we can't take pride in pointing it out.David said:This comes as no surprise to me, looking at the mercurial nature of people. I'd say a new squad would indeed have more activity simply because it's new to them. No?
There was.Loony BoB said:After a brief check, there should be a way to give every team 15 or 16 players at the moment without us having to lose a single one of ours. If we get another player signing in, maybe, but we've always had some teams with one or two more players than the other sides.
Majin said:I demand Geggy stay, especially with Kyle leaving next season. I think the colts have shown enough potential to be able to not just be a springboard team and an ability to compete with any of the other teams on any given day, so to pull it apart would be a step backwards, especially with the team working so well together like it does now. Plus, Geggy is a good lad. Rather him here than a gobby ***** But yeah I mean, if Geg leaves and then Kyle goes too, we might be left with a bad situation in the seam bowling department, and let's be fair, it's not as if any other teams are struggling in that department now either. The dev league bowling is pretty much quality.
As for name change...meh. I'd prefer to stay as the Colts, just because it's what we've been called since the start and there's nothing wrong with the name, but if it has to change, Yellow or Gold is fine.