• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Harold Larwood vs James Anderson

Larwood vs Anderson


  • Total voters
    21

Johan

Cricketer Of The Year
so the Greatest English pacer of them all is agreed to be Sydney Francis Barnes, and the number two is obviously Fiery Fred Trueman, so who is the third Greatest English pacer of all time?
1000012651.jpg
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
Didn't he have a higher reputation than both Lindwall and Trueman
Mhm. He had one of the great series for a pacer, but outside of that his record is (putting it nicely) poor and inconsistent.

For example in his previous Ashes tour, a marvellous 8/62 in the first test. In the other 4 combined, 10/662.

I think it was truly a shame that he never played for England again but I’m only rating him on what he actually did in tests, not what could’ve been.
 

Johan

Cricketer Of The Year
Mhm. He had one of the great series for a pacer, but outside of that his record is (putting it nicely) poor and inconsistent.

For example in his previous Ashes tour, a marvellous 8/62 in the first test. In the other 4 combined, 10/662.

I think it was truly a shame that he never played for England again but I’m only rating him on what he actually did in tests, not what could’ve been.
yeah truly a bummer that he didn't have a career after bodyline
 

Bolo.

International Captain
Mhm. He had one of the great series for a pacer, but outside of that his record is (putting it nicely) poor and inconsistent.

For example in his previous Ashes tour, a marvellous 8/62 in the first test. In the other 4 combined, 10/662.

I think it was truly a shame that he never played for England again but I’m only rating him on what he actually did in tests, not what could’ve been.
That great series came when he was 30ish and going to start aging out soon, and used tactics that were banned after the series.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
That great series came when he was 30ish and going to start aging out soon, and used tactics that were banned after the series.
Yeah I know. Still its a what if. He was still impressive in county. Definitely should have made the 36/37 team. Would have been an interesting psychological choice with Bradman’s first series as captain.

Larwood’s 1936 season..

22 matches 119 @ 12.97 SR 34.24 13 5’fers 4 10’fers (topped averages)
 

Bolo.

International Captain
Yeah I know. Still its a what if. He was still impressive in county. Definitely should have made the 36/37 team. Would have been an interesting psychological choice with Bradman’s first series as captain.

Larwood’s 1936 season..

22 matches 119 @ 12.97 SR 34.24 13 5’fers 4 10’fers (topped averages)
His FC record is great in general, and does leave a bit of a 'what if' feeling to his test record. But the what if is not so strong with him given his years of poorish test performances.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
His FC record is great in general, and does leave a bit of a 'what if' feeling to his test record. But the what if is not so strong with him given his years of poorish test performances.
Yeah I know. I did say he’s overrated and over mythologised earlier
 

the big bambino

Cricketer Of The Year
If you were one of 2 people picking teams and the other guy picked Anderson when he could have had Larwood, you would thank the Lord you were up against such a dumb arse.
 

peterhrt

State 12th Man
yeah truly a bummer that he didn't have a career after bodyline
Larwood refused to play against the Australians in 1934, and made himself unavailable in 1936-37 when he went to India instead.

MCC (on behalf of the British government) was now more interested in maintaining good wider diplomatic relations with Australia than in winning cricket matches. Anybody likely to bowl fast and short was excluded. That meant no Voce in 1934. He had continued to bowl bouncers in county cricket and let it be known he would not spare the Australians. In August he took 8-66 for Notts in the tourists' first innings. Bradman didn't play. By 1936 Voce's stance had softened and he was chosen to tour.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
Larwood refused to play against the Australians in 1934, and made himself unavailable in 1936-37 when he went to India instead.

MCC (on behalf of the British government) was now more interested in maintaining good wider diplomatic relations with Australia than in winning cricket matches. Anybody likely to bowl fast and short was excluded. That meant no Voce in 1934. He had continued to bowl bouncers in county cricket and let it be known he would not spare the Australians. In August he took 8-66 for Notts in the tourists' first innings. Bradman didn't play. By 1936 Voce's stance had softened and he was chosen to tour.
I’m pretty sure it was actually because he wouldn’t issue a public apology. Which he should not have had to.

By the beginning of the 1934 season Larwood was fit again, and it was anticipated that he would play in the Tests. Jardine had earlier issued an unequivocal statement that he would not play. By way of confirming their commitment not to use bodyline, the MCC committee decided that Larwood should apologise to the Australians for his bowling on the 1932–33 tour. No such apology had been requested from Jardine; Larwood refused to do so, insisting that he had bowled precisely as instructed by his captain. Shortly before the second Test, he wrote in the Sunday Dispatch that he was unrepentant about leg theory, adding: "I doubt if I shall ever play against [the Australians] again, at least in big cricket". Larwood's Test career thus ended. In its review of the 1934 season, Wisden commented: "No greater disservice was ever done to English cricket than when Larwood was induced to dash into print and become responsible for statements which put him beyond the pale of being selected for England".

I’m not sure if it was the exact same case for Voce. I do know at one point he asked the MCC not to select him, but then made himself available for 36/37.
 

Top