Johan
Cricketer Of The Year
Tremmlett and Anderson were pivotalOh right the series that Bresnan and Cook won.
Tremmlett and Anderson were pivotalOh right the series that Bresnan and Cook won.
Why I am not sure I buy that hole heatedly is that the film is so incredibly grainy, especially the one shared yesterday, that it looks older than what I've seen of 1953 footage.probably because most of the available footage of him is of him as a 80 year old
For what looked very and remarkably close to spin.he played years of domestic as a 60 year old afaik, outperformed the then 31 year old Constantine but eh
I had the same thought - not sure if people were talking about different footage, but there's surely no way the film shared in this thread was a) showing Barnes in his 80s, or b) film from the 1950s.Why I am not sure I buy that hole heatedly is that the film is so incredibly grainy, especially the one shared yesterday, that it looks older than what I've seen of 1953 footage.
I've never seen a picture of him, or even spoken of where the keeper was standing back.
So to say he's more comparable to Ambrose is a bit of a stretch to me.
This video tells at 1:01 that the footage was from when he was 80 years old.I had the same thought - not sure if people were talking about different footage, but there's surely no way the film shared in this thread was a) showing Barnes in his 80s, or b) film from the 1950s.
Ah OK, that's different film to what I was thinking of - thanks.This video tells at 1:01 that the footage was from when he was 80 years old.
No, because Barnes's feat is actually unprecedented in the history of the game, I can't see anyone replicating it, the same way I can't see Barnes hit 145 kmph like Ambrose did (in the first part of his career).For what looked very and remarkably close to spin.
Do we believe that Murali, Lillee, Trueman, anyone of the modern era would.dominate any form of quality cricket at 60?
because he's not as goodWhy is Barnes not as appreciated or celebrated like Don?
He’s even older and he’s nowhere near as much of a statistical outlier.Why is Barnes not as appreciated or celebrated like Don?
I think he's mentioned more than someone like Hutton or Hammond, and that's a feat considering how he's older than them and he was despised as an individual at the time.I mean he is even barely mentioned
That's true. Among those who said Barnes was the best bowler they ever saw were: Hobbs, Woolley, Strudwick, MacLaren, Rhodes, Warner, Johnny Tyldesley and Arthur Gilligan among Englishmen. Plus Noble, Hill, Macartney and Faulkner.I think he's mentioned more than someone like Hutton or Hammond, and that's a feat considering how he's older than them and he was despised as an individual at the time.
Hammond. Hutton. Hobbs.All of them are seen as pre war batsmen. No cricketer except Don Bradman from that era is talked about nowadaysI think he's mentioned more than someone like Hutton or Hammond, and that's a feat considering how he's older than them and he was despised as an individual at the time.
would add in Constantine who must've seen him only in late 20s.That's true. Among those who said Barnes was the best bowler they ever saw were: Hobbs, Woolley, Strudwick, MacLaren, Rhodes, Warner, Johnny Tyldesley and Arthur Gilligan among Englishmen. Plus Noble, Hill, Macartney and Faulkner.
should visit Yorkshire one day mateHammond. Hutton. Hobbs.All of them are seen as pre war batsmen. No cricketer except Don Bradman from that era is talked about nowadays
Why?should visit Yorkshire one day mate
It was Hutton’s county.Why?