Johan
International Captain
Kapil has 253 @ 27.5 with 3.72 econLol he doesn't.
Imran has 182 @ 26.6 with 3.90 econ
Kapil's winning
Kapil has 253 @ 27.5 with 3.72 econLol he doesn't.
Which is a perfectly fine view. I just think if you are picking a bowling ER then a notable bowling difference should be the decider.Yes
Kapil Dev offers the X factor in batting
You study Bio???? You disgust meOkay enough shitposting, I'm going. I have to study bio.
(Lol I always rated Kapil as the greatest AR in ODI, and a better bowler than Imran. Close tho)
Imran still is a better wicket-taker bowler but now they have a 5 run difference in RPI overall.Kapil has 253 @ 27.5 with 3.72 econ
Imran has 182 @ 26.6 with 3.90 econ
Kapil's winning on longevity
The difference is around in SR as well, so...back to Maxwell vs MarkramImran still is a better wicket-taker bowler but now they have a 5 run difference in RPI overall.
That's not how cricket was played in the 80s and even early 90s. You were trying to get wickets to stem runs too and bowl teams out.hampering the volume of runs to lead your side to victory was a perfectly known tactic, most bowlers can't take 4-5 wickets consistently in 10 overs, 2/40 has about as much impact as a 1/35
Say will you take Shikhar Dhawan over Buttler in ODIs???Imran still is a better wicket-taker bowler but now they have a 5 run difference in RPI overall.
Kapil literally won a ODI game against Australia in 1986 by not leaking runs and making them fall shortThat's not how cricket was played in the 80s and even early 90s. You were trying to get wickets to stem runs too and bowl teams out.
Kapil, Flintoff and Pollock for meOkay enough shitposting, I'm going. I have to study bio.
(Lol I always rated Kapil as the greatest AR in ODI, and a better bowler than Imran. Close tho)
Yeah Imran did that too but that wasn't the modus operandi if you were a lead pacer for your team in that era. You wanted wickets up front.Kapil literally won a ODI game against Australia in 1986 by not leaking runs and making them fall short
I didn't bring this RPI measure bro, he did. So I wanted to see if he cares when the difference between them is clear.Say will you take Shikhar Dhawan over Buttler in ODIs???
I used to rate Klusener there, but given his USP is literally batting; him batting at 8 behind Pollock for majority of his 8 year career is like really significant to ignore personally.Kapil, Flintoff and Pollock for me
Does not matters really. These two have around 5 RPI difference and 25 in SR. Will you really even consider Dhawan??I didn't bring this RPI measure bro, he did. So I wanted to see if he cares when the difference between them is clear.
Depends on the team and role. If I am in a weaker batting side, I prefer the higher RPI. I think that is obvious.Does not matters really. These two have around 5 RPI difference and 25 in SR. Will you really even consider Dhawan??
I think you don't watch much ODIs is obvious...... I no team I will consider Dhawan ahead of Buttler; and I really rate Dhawan and don't Jos that highly.Depends on the team and role. If I am in a weaker batting side, I prefer the higher RPI. I think that is obvious.
Again, I am not talking about Dhawan and Buttler but both of their RPIs are sufficiently high enough to render SR more relevant.I think you don't watch much ODIs is obvious...... I no team I will consider Dhawan ahead of Buttler; and I really rate Dhawan and don't Jos that highly.
Just like as the RPIs are higher so is the batting positions. Lower down the order no one wants a slow poke really.Again, I am not talking about Dhawan and Buttler but both of their RPIs are sufficiently high enough to render SR more relevant.
We are talking bats in the 80s with low RPIs in weaker batting units. Yeah sorry in that context the high RPI wins.
Kapil with a great SR but a RPI of 19 isnt affecting the games you think he is.
I mean, Imran wasn't one down the order either. He was adaptable in a way Kapil was not.Just like as the RPIs are higher so is the batting positions. Lower down the order no one wants a slow poke really.