• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Kapil Dev vs Courtney Walsh

Kapil Dev vs Courtney Walsh


  • Total voters
    27

capt_Luffy

International Coach
That's all good and well so long as you realize the reverse is also true. What reverse you ask? The wickets in the Caribbean. They weren't all conducive to pace. 2 were, 2 were flat roads and the last QPO was a mixed bag.
Carribbean was a mixed bag. But I will say on the whole during Kapil's career, they were significantly more conducive to pace overall than the Indian ones.
 

Coronis

Hall of Fame Member
Imo, to be atg you have to guarantee a spot in your teams at xi and not look out of place in a world ATG XI . Atg should be rarefied air imo. Atg all rounders in particular, should be great in at least one of their disciplines or close to it. Atg AR: Sobers, Imran, Hadlee, Kallis (on the fence regarding Miller and Pollock).
So hypothetically in 50 years you could consider Tendulkar and Lara and Marshall and McGrath as not ATGs anymore? (hypothetical situation of course but I’m really curious as to whether there’s an actual stopping point for this line of thinking)

Dev played 3 games in SA at his career end and Eng wasn't certainly a favourable condition in. And Walsh was excellent in India, but 90s India was strangely not that flat to pacers. Through our that decade, no Indian pacer with more than 2 wickets averages 32+. That includes a fair few scrubs as well.
?
 

Top