Fun fact: there are only 31 pace bowlers who have taken 200 ODI wkts. Shami's economy rate of 5.57 is the worst of those 31Shami is an easy top 10 in my books.
And the best strike rate too. His WC record is comparable only to Starc and McGrath, and both of them would make the top ten.Fun fact: there are only 31 bowlers who have taken 200 ODI wkts. Shami's economy rate of 5.57 is the worst of those 31
And he probably has the best strike rate out of those 31. High risk, high reward.Fun fact: there are only 31 bowlers who have taken 200 ODI wkts. Shami's economy rate of 5.57 is the worst of those 31
So top 10 is going a bit too far (top 25 for sure)
Also the best Strike rate, best wicket per match and probably the best WC record ever.Fun fact: there are only 31 bowlers who have taken 200 ODI wkts. Shami's economy rate of 5.57 is the worst of those 31
Amazed how close Starc and Shami's records areAlso the best Strike rate, best wicket per match and probably the best WC record ever.
DonaldArguably the best first change bowler in ODIs as well.
Yeah. Both have great WC records too; Shami's record is probably better and could surpass Starc's wicket tally in the next WC.Amazed how close Starc and Shami's records are
Starc: 127 games, 244 wkts @ 23.40, econ 5.26, SR 26.6, 1.92 wpm, 12 - 4W, 9 - 5W
Shami: 105 games, 202 wkts @ 23.85, econ 5.57, SR 25.6, 1.92 wpm, 10 - 4W, 6 - 5W
Donald and Waqar make good arguments tooDonald
Yeah I feel it's a bit too early for him, especially since even Warne or Shami haven't been voted in yetI'm interested by all the votes for Rashid Khan when he has a poor record against good teams.
Youve convinced me so I just changed my vote from Rashid Khan to ShamiI'm interested by all the votes for Rashid Khan when he has a poor record against good teams.
He is one of the most overrated going (still good but not an ATG, sorta like RTD having h4x figures for the same reason)I'm interested by all the votes for Rashid Khan when he has a poor record against good teams.