• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Jimmy Anderson vs Ashwin

Better Bowler

  • Jimmy Anderson

    Votes: 24 50.0%
  • Ashwin

    Votes: 24 50.0%

  • Total voters
    48

Randomfan

U19 Debutant
did you watch Cricket in the 2010s?

Why are you pretending Australia is bowler friendly in the 2010s until like COVID?
Watched, all series in Aus. Just because Aus conditions became more pacer's friendly after covid, it hardly means that it was not pacer's friendly in 2010s in context of this thread.


Pacers in Aus in with 20+ wickets in 2010s :

1739637855876.png


If you really want to see what unfriendly conditions means,

Spinners in Aus with 20+ wickets in 2010s:

1739637998292.png
 

capt_Luffy

International Coach
2010 onward he averages 30 in Australia, given the lack of support and one full series of injury, and flat decks in two of those series, that's pretty good, his home record against Australia is a bigger problem.
2018 onwards Ashwin averages sub 30 in Australia as well. Given pitches and impact he had on 2021 BGT win, not too bad.
 

Johan

International Captain
Watched, all series in Aus. Just because Aus conditions became more pacer's friendly after covid, it hardly means that it was not pacer's friendly in 2010s in context of this thread.


Pacers in Aus in with 20+ wickets in 2010s :

View attachment 45394


If you really want to see what unfriendly conditions means,

Spinners in Aus with 20+ wickets in 2010s:

View attachment 45395
away pacer in Australia in 2010s


away pacers in India in 2000s found more success



it's flat as ****

The Australian pacers found success on their wickets, has something to do with their ability to produce reverse swing on the flattest decks, same thing Imran Khan did in 80s.
 

Johan

International Captain
So around equal in Australia once remove the rough early tours for both....
it's 3 good tours vs 1, 2 of them being in the flattest conditions ever, plus the reason why I use that cutoff for Anderson is because Ashwin debuted 2 years after start of 2010 (approx) and retired few months after Jimny
 

capt_Luffy

International Coach
it's 3 good tours vs 1, 2 of them being in the flattest conditions ever, plus the reason why I use that cutoff for Anderson is because Ashwin debuted 2 years after start of 2010 (approx) and retired few months after Jimny
2. 2018 was also good. Plus Australia is way tougher for spinners in comparison. Post 2010 Jimmy just toured more, so has more failures as well.
 

Johan

International Captain
2. 2018 was also good. Plus Australia is way tougher for spinners in comparison.
that was one test though, that's like me saying 6/79 from Anderson at Wankhede in 2006 was great.

if you wanna go that route, I'm just gonna compare what's tough for Ashwin (SENA) to what's tough for Anderson (Asia).
 

Randomfan

U19 Debutant
Ok

but Australia of 2010s was not pacer friendly, Dale Steyn is one of the greatest bowlers to ever walk planet Earth and even he averages 29 on these Australian pitches
Steyn played peak of cricket in super flat era period. Some hosts even made more flat to counter Steyn and Co. Anyway, pitches everywhere were more flat during his playing days. After 2014, nature of pitches were more bowler's friendly.

That's why when anyone cites career avg of batsmen during 2000-2014 period, I don't take career average literally. On flat pich, you can bash even good bowling sides in your peak and if you can play lots of cricket against poor sides on super flat tracks during your peak then you can simply cash in big big time. That's the reason I always look for how players did against top sides compared to others in the same time. At least, you have top sides as opposition even if pitches were flat.

Same reason I feel, Root can finish below 50 Avg but hardly means that he will be inferior to all bastmen of 2000-2014 period who finished with 50 plus average. 15-20 bastmen averaged very high in that period. Fans treat 49.8 different than 50.2, but I don't think it makes much difference and it make even less sense when taking flat track era raw avg and trying to compare with other periods.

Runs per wicket: 2000-2014

1739639031892.png


Runs per wicket's : 2015-2019
1739638713559.png


Everyone avg will be lower after 2014 including Ashwin.

Ashwin in SENA away Since 2015: Most unfriendly conditions for spinners and Ashwin's biggest weakness in his record. Yet his avg is 32.

1739639385196.png

I am not citing this to show that Ahswin's record was great in most unfriendly conditions for him after 2014. I am simply showing that clubbing entire 2010 will miss the point how pitches started changing around 2014. All bowler's benefitted from that including Anderson and Ashwin.
 
Last edited:

capt_Luffy

International Coach
that was one test though, that's like me saying 6/79 from Anderson at Wankhede in 2006 was great.

if you wanna go that route, I'm just gonna compare what's tough for Ashwin (SENA) to what's tough for Anderson (Asia).
My point simply being, post 2018 Ashwin really didn't took a wrong step in Australia. Can point to his last Test if you want to, but meh.
 

Johan

International Captain
@Randomfan


Steyn played peak of cricket in super flat era period. Some hosts even made more flat to counter Steyn and Co. Anyway, pitches everywhere were more flat during his playing days. After 2014, nature of pitches were more bowler's friendly.
That is fine, but Australian pitches statistically did not improve until 2020, the Pakistan series had roads, the Ashes 2017 were roads, 2010 was roads and so forth, the Australian pitches were so flat that their own fans were disappointed, now that we're a good while away you're attempting to rewrite history here but that's not how this works. in the 2000s Australian pitches were flat enough for bowlers for away pacers to average 38 on them, more than 2000s Indian wickets which are generally considered flat.

for a while, India was genuinely a better place to bowl pace in than Australia.

That's why when anyone cites career avg of batsmen during 2000-2014 period, I don't take career average literally. On flat pich, you can bash even good bowling sides in your peak and if you can play lots of cricket against poor sides on super flat tracks during your peak then you can simply cash in big big time. That's the reason I always look for how players did against top sides compared to others in the same time. At least, you have top sides as opposition even if pitches were flat.

Everyone avg will be lower after 2014 including Ashwin
see my friend, the problem here is simple.

Your cutoff point is nonsensical, infact, until 2015-2019, Australia recorded comfortably the highest Run per wicket on planet Earth.


38

let me put it like someone else on this site would put

T H I R T Y E I G H T
H
I
R
T
Y
E
I
G
H
T

for reference


the average is 30.49 since the second world war, Australia deviated from the average in those years by nearly 25%, and it's obvious too, look at the averages of australian batters home and away from this era.

Michael Clarke: 62 at home, 39 away
Shaun Marsh: 40 at home, 29 away
David Warner (till 2019): 64 at home, 34 away
Michael Hussey: 61 at home, 41 away

here is a report of a pitch from the time, The Dreaded MCG pitch


It's very obvious Australian pitches changed during 2018-19 BGT or the COVID, you don't need to change history just because you prefer Ashwin over Anderson.

in 2014/15 England got weaker, India became minefields, South Africa became spicier once Steyn started playing less, Australia was one of the last places to change.

I am not citing this to show that Ahswin's record was great in most unfriendly conditions for him after 2014. I am simply showing that clubbing entire 2010 will miss the point how pitches started changing around 2014. All bowler's benefitted from that including Anderson and Ashwin
first thing, I only use 2010 because that's when Anderson got his old action back and Ashwin debuted around 20 months later and retired only a couple months after Anderson retired so the cut off works.

second, I don't particularly care where Ashwin ranks between spinners, the fact that Joe Root somehow shows up in the top 10 just tells you everything you need to know about spin bowling, the fact is that there is really no great spinner around, in history you've 3 spinners on the level of great pacers, a top 10 spinner might not be top 30-35 pacers, in modern day most attacks have 3-4 pacers and barely one spinner and even the spinner gets dropped at times. (IE, Ashwin on SENA tours)

so at the end, even with all of this, and a much later cut off that poses seriously longevity question marks, Anderson in unhelpful condition is still 24.8 compared to 33 for Ashwin.

You can prefer Ashwin for home record, tha
t's fine, but pretending their away record is even is silly
 
Last edited:

Randomfan

U19 Debutant
@Randomfan

That is fine, but Australian pitches statistically did not improve until 2020, the Pakistan series had roads, the Ashes 2017 were roads,
Aus batting has averaged 45+ at home against all teams except India after Bumrah debuted. It hardly means that Aus pitches were total roads in the same period. Output has two factors, pitch being flat and bowling quality. We can't simply start dismissing all periods saying that pitch was flat that's why Anderson did not do well.

1739643897993.png



All bowling sides away avg 2015-2019:

Indian bolwing unit averaging 26 and Eng bowling iunit averaging 37 was due to difference in quality between those two bowling sides. We can't start saying that whenever Eng played they go flat tracks. As I said oputput has two major factors, pitch and quality of bowling. Eng averaging 37+ as bowling sides everywhere away is not due to just flat pitches. It was due to Anderson and Co. not being that great.

1739644602298.png
 

Johan

International Captain
Aus batting has averaged 45+ at home against all teams except India after Bumrah debuted. It hardly means that Aus pitches were total roads in the same period. Output has two factors, pitch being flat and bowling quality. We can't simply start dismissing all periods saying that pitch was flat that's why Anderson did not do well.

View attachment 45404



All bowling sides away avg 2015-2019:

Indian bolwing unit averaging 26 and Eng bowling iunit averaging 37 was due to difference in quality between those two bowling sides. We can't start saying that whenever Eng played they go flat tracks. As I said oputput has two major factors, pitch and quality of bowling. Eng averaging 37+ as bowling sides everywhere away is not due to just Aus pitches or anything. It was due to Anderson and Co. not being that great.

View attachment 45405
Again...not really, since 2020
1000011983.png
not too high scoring against India/England/Pakistan, NZ is just one match, good work against South Africa and......the expected against the West Indies.

meanwhile 2014-2017

1000011985.png

No matter how you spin out, Australia of 2000s was flat as ****.
 

Randomfan

U19 Debutant
Again...not really, since 2020
I wasn't claming that pitches in Aus were not better after 2020. I was using it as exmaple to show that citing poor avg for any bowling side in any period can't be used to show that pitches were flat.

You can ignore period after 2020 and see Eng bowling averaged 37 plus away even during 2015-2019. Reason was not flat tracks. It has something to do with quality of bowling as well. In same peiord many others teams had far better away bowling avg due to quality of bowlers being better.

No matter which way you cut it, Anderson's away in SENA with avg 32-33 and SR 66 is poor for any pacer. That's surelty goes as negative for Anderson. If you can't step up in friendly conditions then it's an issue. I will have zero doubt on Ahswin's ability in spinner;s friendly conditions when playing away. On other hands, Ashwin's record is worse than Anderson's record in unfriendly conditions when playing away. Not unexpeted because pacers should be able to do better than spinners in unfriendly conditions.

WIth all this friendly and unfriendly , we often forget that SENA teams were top teams during Ashwin's career. Doing well against strongest teams in their dens is always going to be harder than bottom tier teams. It's becomes even harder when conditions are unfriendly to you.

If you feel that Anderson away was leagues ahead then we just have to agree to disagree. I don't think he was leagues ahead when playing away.

---------------------

In context of this thread, Ashwin seems better to me as bowler. I am going by home, away, over all, against top teams and all factors taken together. Adding his batting will make it lopsided for me. In bowling, the gap is not that big for me because Anderson was great at home, but then Ashwin was greater at home. After all Ashwin has the most, 11, MOS in history of cricket tied with Murali. It's mostly due to how great he was at home in all kinds of tracks. Even on realtively flatter tracks at home, he could trouble batsmen. Ashwin takes it as a bowler for me.
 

Johan

International Captain
I wasn't claming that pitches in Aus were not better after 2020. I was using it as exmaple to show that citing poor avg for any bowling side in any period can't be used to show that pitches were flat.

You can ignore period after 2020 and see Eng bowling averaged 37 plus away even during 2015-2019. Reason was not flat tracks. It has something to do with quality of bowling as well. In same peiord many others teams had far better away bowling avg due to quality of bowlers being better.

No matter which way you cut it, Anderson's away in SENA with avg 32-33 and SR 66 is poor for any pacer. That's surelty goes as negative for Anderson. If you can't step up in friendly conditions then it's an issue. I will have zero doubt on Ahswin's ability in spinner;s friendly conditions when playing away. On other hands, Ashwin's record is worse than Anderson's record in unfriendly conditions when playing away. Not unexpeted because pacers should be able to do better than spinners in unfriendly conditions.

WIth all this friendly and unfriendly , we often forget that SENA teams were top teams during Ashwin's career. Doing well against strongest teams in their dens is always going to be harder than bottom tier teams. It's becomes even harder when conditions are unfriendly to you.

If you feel that Anderson away was leagues ahead then we just have to agree to disagree. I don't think he was leagues ahead when playing away.

---------------------

In context of this thread, Ashwin seems better to me as bowler. I am going by home, away, over all, against top teams and all factors taken together. Adding his batting will make it lopsided for me. In bowling, the gap is not that big for me because Anderson was great at home, but then Ashwin was greater at home. After all Ashwin has the most, 11, MOS in history of cricket tied with Murali. It's mostly due to how great he was at home in all kinds of tracks. Even on realtively flatter tracks at home, he could trouble batsmen. Ashwin takes it as a bowler for me.
I don't really take his career before 2010 or so seriously, he has a suffeciently long career for a cut off point and his earlier years were ruined by a "classical" action being forced on him that was not exactly his original style, once he returned to his OG style he was immediately a world class bowler and I personally don't think that such a thing and stark contrast was simply some sort of coincidence.

Dude, everyone knows the flaws of the late 2010s England side, it was a good team but once Cook bowed out there were serious struggles, but it's not really a controversial opinion to state that 2010s Australian pitches weren't particularly bowler friendly at all, there are many instances of this being shown, the 2017 Dreaded MCG wicket, the road served for India in 2014 BGT, the absolute roads served in the 2010 Ashes where Cook averaged 110 I think, it's not a controversial opinion at at all, talk to any member of the site who has been here for a long time and they'd tell you the 2010s Australia wickets were indeed very flat, one even thinks Papa New Guinea had more test standard wickets and pitches than Australia, and statistics very much do support that fact, so for Anderson to take 24 @ 26 in 2010/11 and then 17 @ 27 shows his skill on roads, it's not a negative.

I don't think either is lightyears ahead of the other anywhere, Ashwin at home averages 21, Anderson at home from 2010-24 averaged around 22, there is a WPM difference but imo that's mostly offset by the pitch quality difference, Ashwin was served some absolute fast turners where people like Bess, Root, Santner and Patel can be unplayable at times to even the batters who grew up in India where even the natural pitch is spinny, Anderson was served wickets that were a lot more neutral, there was a flat pitch pretty much every series in England and some serieses were full blown flat, of course England still counters as seamer/swinger friendly overall but was not as hostile to batsmen from foreign nations as the Indian wickets were in a lot of the serieses, obviously Ashwin only had some flat wickets where his success is ignored, 2016 Mumbai wicket against England is a great example of him turning it squares on a wicket that was decently flat.

overall, I feel like it comes down to Anderson being a lot better on roads and slow pitches than Ashwin is in SENA, while Ashwin was a lot better against Australia with the 27 average compared to Jimmy's 36, I think Ashwin is reasonably close to Anderson, just not going to agree with the concept of them being relative away from their comfort zone.
 

Top