May I know whom you consider 1 & 2?Walcott Kept for 15 matches. Ames is arguably the 3rd greatest WK batter.
Top 4:-May I know whom you consider 1 & 2?
is Ames even better than PriorTop 4:-
Gilchrist
Knott
Sangakkara
Ames
Lol lemme guess Hobbs does based on B&W photos?doesn't have the aura
Yeah, plus even if he didn't, his performance would make up for the lack of aura etcLol lemme guess Hobbs does back on B&W photos?
Ames record is really good for a batsman who averaged 40. He scored runs everywhere except in Australia but even there he didn't really let his team down. He'd have been even better if he played as just a batsman. I think he's clearly better than Knott as a batsman (though not as a keeper.)Ames batting being way overrated here. Yeah I was probably a bit disingenuous with Carey but Ames’ record is vastly held up by performances against weak attacks. I’d much rather have Knott batting in an Ashes series than Ames.
Yes he does.Lol lemme guess Hobbs does based on B&W photos?
I know that's referred to as the Golden Age. I consider it the Bronze Age. The Golden Age is the war periods. Then the Silver Age then the Modern Age.So the Golden Age was 1890-1914, what were the 20’s and 30’s?
That makes total sense..I know that's referred to as the Golden Age. I consider it the Bronze Age. The Golden Age is the war periods. Then the Silver Age then the Modern Age.
Averaging 17? On Australian pitches? In the 30’s? And you want him to play as a full time bat?Ames record is really good for a batsman who averaged 40. He scored runs everywhere except in Australia but even there he didn't really let his team down. He'd have been even better if he played as just a batsman. I think he's clearly better than Knott as a batsman (though not as a keeper.)
Why not? He was picked as a keeper and I've gone through his test innings some time back and it didn't really hurt the side. Runs were still scored. But if he was picked as a bat he'd concentrate on that aspect and improve. 100 fc tons plus a test ave of 40 mainly or all scored as a keeper means he was a batsmen in his own right.That makes total sense..
Averaging 17? On Australian pitches? In the 30’s? And you want him to play as a full time bat?
I also don’t think it suddenly makes him the second or third best keeper bat which was what was being claimed.Ames' FC record is magnificent -- honestly, nearing ATVG-level. Sure, he wasn't much good in his 10 tests on flat Australian decks, but that doesn't suddenly make him equivalent to someone who averaged 35 IMO.
The competition is atrocious. The past decade and a half has produced a very large chunk of the best keeper-batsmen of all-time because for a long time conventional wisdom had the balance between keeping and batting all wrong. The few who defied that trend like Ames, Walcott, and Lindsay – and to a lesser degree Parks, Waite, and Knott – are naturally going to occupy a higher place in the WKB stakes now than in 40 years' time.I also don’t think it suddenly makes him the second or third best keeper bat which was what was being claimed.